Sexual selection and speciation.

By T. M. Panhuis, R. Butlin, M. Zuk, Tom Tregenza. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2001

1,301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b75e342180aaba89e37b821b13c3145826003ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Hybridization and speciation (2013, background): “Assortative mating can be a result of sexual selection, social organization, reinforcement or a by-product of adaptation to different habitats (Ritchie, 2007; Seifert, 2010; Sobel et al., 2010).”
Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris (2003, background): “The temporal structure of the call may indicate the male’s current nutritional condition (Wagner & Hoback 1999), and is at least partly heritable (Cade 1981; Hedrick 1988; Gray & Cade 2000).”
Beaks, Adaptation, and Vocal Evolution in Darwin's Finches (2004, background): “Sexual selection often drives signals to evolve towards increasingly elaborate and distinct forms (Ryan et al. 1990, Endler 1992, Panhuis et al. 2001 ).”
Beyond Reproductive Isolation: Demographic Controls on the Speciation Process (2019, methodology): “High-throughput sequencing and new methods for analyzing genomic data (e.g., Petkova et al. 2016) have increased our ability to resolve genetic breaks across species and to determine patterns of migration across these breaks.”
The use of multiple cues in mate choice (2003, background): “Traits that have arisen through the exploitation of sensory biases in the females, on the other hand, are less likely to lead directly to speciation, as females would interbreed with both male populations unless female sensory biases also changed (Panhuis et al., 2001).”
How sensory drive can promote speciation (2002, neutral): “Recent comparative and experimental studies offer support to this long-standing idea [ 1 ,2].”
The evolution of geographic variation in birdsong (2007, background): “Primary examples of such traits are mating ornaments and displays which, in many animals, are centrally involved in mate recognition and mate selection (Andersson, 1994; Boughman, 2001; Foster, 1999; Panhuis et al., 2001; Wells and Henry, 1998; West‐Eberhard, 1983).”
No evidence that sexual selection is an ‘engine of speciation’ in birds (2003, background): “Given the possible opposing effects of sexual selection on speciation and extinction, we suggest that predictions regarding the correlation between species richness and indices of sexual selection (see Panhuis et al. 2001 and above) may have to be revised.”
Plumage coloration, not length or symmetry of tail-streamers, is a sexually selected trait in North American barn swallows (2004, background): “Instead, our results are consistent with hypotheses that advocate sexual selection as a mechanism that drives character divergence and ultimately speciation (Panhuis et al., 2001).”
The Evolution of Animal Weapons (2008, methodology): “This logic has been incorporated into recent theoretical models for the evolution of ornament diversity and speciation (i.e., for female choice; Higashi et al. 1999, Panhuis et al. 2001, Pomiankowski & Iwasa 1998, Ritchie 2007, Schluter & Price 1993), but has yet to be considered for weapons.”