How sensory drive can promote speciation

By Janette Boughman. 2002

565 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8691c385e9bd3e16b0450694f2774209c48d7f91

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

How plant¿animal interactions signal new insights in communication (2004, background): “The sensory drive model posits that all are interdependent, with changes in one inducing changes in the others [1, 45 ].”
Multimodal communication of wolf spiders on different substrates: evidence for behavioural plasticity (2011, background): “…species have evolved signals that function best in specific environments by matching signals and transmission characteristics of the environment (Fleishman 1992; Endler & Thery 1996; Macedonia 2001; Boughman 2002; Gray et al. 2008; Seehausen et al. 2008; Cocroft et al. 2010; Elias et al. 2010).”
Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish (2008, background): “A strong association between LWS alleles and water depth emerges from these results, supporting prediction (2): at Marumbi and Luanso islands, most individuals reside in waters less than 3 m deep.”
Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers (2008, background): “Divergence in such traits favors assortative mating and may lead to reproductive isolation (West-Eberhard 1983; Schluter and Price 1993; Boughman 2002; Coyne and Orr 2004).”
Sexual selection and mate choice. (2006, background): “ornaments initially evolved through female sensory biases [22,77, 78 ], but the evolution of female sensory bias itself requires”
On the role of male competition in speciation: a review and research agenda (2018, methodology): “Sensory drive (the evolution of signals and sensory systems to maximize detectability in the environment in which they are used; Boughman 2002; Maan and Seehausen 2011; Smith et al.”
Complex courtship displays facilitate male reproductive success and plasticity in signaling across variable environments (2011, background): “…Condition-dependent, Lycosidae, Rabidosa rabida, Efficacy back-up, Redundant signals The environment is an important source of selection on both signalers and receivers and has had a considerable influence on the evolution of reproductive communication (Endler, 1992; 1993; Boughman, 2002).”
Ecological speciation in phytophagous insects (2010, background): “…properties, different trait values for signal and mating preference traits might accrue high fitness in different habitats, resulting in habitat-specific and divergent selection on sensory systems and mating preferences (i.e., ‘sensory drive’ – see Endler, 1992; Boughman, 2002 for reviews).”
Calls, colours, shape, and genes: a multi-trait approach to the study of geographic variation in the Amazonian frog Allobates femoralis (2009, background): “The null hypothesis that divergence in mate-recognition traits is correlated with genetic divergence and geographic distance between populations should be regularly tested (Tilley, Verrell & Arnold, 1990; Panhuis et al., 2001; Boughman, 2002).”
Oviposition preference and larval performance within a diverging lineage of lycaenid butterflies (2004, background): “Assessing the relative contributions of these different factors is difficult (Capy et al., 2000; Boughman, 2002; Nosil et al., 2002), but one prediction that can be made is that if ecological differences among populations are to be important in the evolution of reproductive isolation, then there sho”
AVIAN SEXUAL DICHROMATISM IN RELATION TO PHYLOGENY AND ECOLOGY (2003, background): “In addition, the sensory drive hypothesis predicts convergence of preferences and ornaments across lineages with similar ecological conditions (Hill 1994b, Prum 1997, Boughman 2002).”
Host shifts and signal divergence: mating signals covary with host use in a complex of specialized plant‐feeding insects (2009, background): “Sensory drive (Endler, 1992; Boughman, 2002) is one possibility (e.g., divergent selection arising from differences in the vibration-transmitting properties of the host plants).”