Beaks, Adaptation, and Vocal Evolution in Darwin's Finches

By J. Podos, S. Nowicki. 2004

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3da2678b72a1c3d77cfe6ba21014f1b52ec3b5cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. Sarah K. Huber
2. J. Podos
3. P. Warren
4. B. Ballentine
5. E. Goodale
6. S. Kotagama
7. Anthony Herrel
8. W. A. Searcy

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Sarah K. Huber
2. J. Podos
3. P. Warren
4. B. Ballentine
5. Anthony Herrel
6. E. Goodale
7. S. Kotagama
8. W. A. Searcy

Citations in the corpus

• Beak morphology and song features covary in a population of Darwin’s finches (Geospiza fortis) (2006, background): “Predicted outcomes of these tests are guided by the vocal tract constraint hypothesis (Podos & Nowicki, 2004a, b), which posits that birds with larger beaks are able to achieve only comparatively low levels of realized vocal performance.”
• The evolution of geographic variation in birdsong (2007, background): “populations of a given species experiencing themost severe constraints on trill evolution (Podos and Nowicki, 2004b).”