Contents of Volume 18
By D. Bender, L. Tischendorf, L. Fahrig. Landscape Ecology, 2004
263 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b3ad5a8fbc7b965f14ed387bd47a6a3cf5c16d5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- L. Fahrig
- V. Arroyo‐Rodríguez
- Justin M. Calabrese
- William F. Fagan
- David M. Theobald
- P. Peres‐Neto
- Bailey Jacobson
- D. Bender
In Global and Planetary Change
- L. Fahrig
- William F. Fagan
- Justin M. Calabrese
- D. Bender
- David M. Theobald
- P. Peres‐Neto
- Bailey Jacobson
- K. Crooks
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- L. Fahrig
- Justin M. Calabrese
- William F. Fagan
- D. Bender
- V. Arroyo‐Rodríguez
- Anne M. Bartuszevige
- David M. Theobald
- K. Crooks
Citations in the corpus
- Conceptualization and Measurement of Habitat Fragmentation from the Primates’ Perspective (2009, background): “Bender et al. (2003) and Tischendorf et al. (2003) demonstrated that area-based isolation metrics such as the amount of available habitat within a given radius of a fragment are the most reliable measure of fragment isolation (Fig.”
- A comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA (2008, methodology): “These area-weighted metrics used a modification of the proximity index (Moilanen and Nieminen 2002; Bender et al. 2003) where we calculated, for a pair of neighboring fragments, the product of the areas divided by the distance between fragments.”
- Evaluation of patch isolation metrics in mosaic landscapes for specialist vs. generalist dispersers (2004, background): “Results of a related study (Bender et al. 2002) indicate a much lower predictive potential of the proximity indices when applied in landscape patterns obtained from GIS landcover maps.”
- Testing the habitat amount hypothesis for South American small mammals (2017, background): “Area-weighted isolation metrics are generally better predictors of isolation than simple distance-based measures (Bender et al., 2003; Tischendorf et al., 2003).”
- MATRIX STRUCTURE OBSCURES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERPATCH MOVEMENT AND PATCH SIZE AND ISOLATION (2005, methodology): “We used a modified version of the model in Bender et al. (2003), which is a stochastic, spatially explicit model that represents a landscape as a spatial grid of cells.”
- Relationships among ecological traits of wild bee communities along gradients of habitat amount and fragmentation (2017, result): “A decrease in the abundance of small-bodied species with decreasing habitat amount was also found in previous studies (Bommarco et al. 2010, Williams et al. 2010, Jauker et al. 2013). However, Larsen et al. (2005) found the opposite pattern as large-bodied species were more sensitive to habitat loss”
- The importance of functional connectivity in the conservation of a ground-dwelling mammal in an urban Australian landscape (2007, background): “Patch isolation is a measure of the lack of habitat in the landscape surrounding a fragment (Fahrig 2003), often quantified using buffer measures (Bender et al. 2003; Tischendorf et al. 2003).”
- The influence of thematic resolution on metric selection for biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes (2007, background): “The nearest-neighbour metric has been criticized for being too simplistic as a connectivity measure (Moilanen and Nieminen 2002) and as an immigration measure it is known to be sensitive to changes in patch size and shape ( Bender et al. 2003 ).”
- Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis (2013, background): “Of the various measures of patch isolation (above), the amount of habitat within an appropriate distance of a patch (and measures that are highly correlated with it) best predicts patch immigration rate and related ecological responses (Moilanen & Nieminen, 2002; Bender et al., 2003; Tischendorf et ”
- The influence of landscape, patch, and within-patch factors on species presence and abundance: a review of focal patch studies (2010, background): “Simulated animal movement patterns are more highly correlated with buffer-based measures of isolation than Euclidean distance or connectivity measures (Bender et al. 2003; Tischendorf et al. 2003).”
- Biodiversity, species interactions and ecological networks in a fragmented world (2012, background): “and depends on physical distance and matrix quality (Bender et al., 2003).”
- The relative importance of landscape and community features in the invasion of an exotic shrub in a fragmented landscape (2006, methodology): “Our choice of 1500 m as the radius for landscape buffer was based on analysis of data from buffers (Lee et al. 2002, Bender et al. 2003 ) of distances 250, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, and 3000 m from each woodlot perimeter.”