The influence of landscape, patch, and within-patch factors on species presence and abundance: a review of focal patch studies

By D. Thornton, L. Branch, M. Sunquist. Landscape Ecology, 2010

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ecological Responses to Habitat Fragmentation Per Se (2017, background): “…less isolated than Patch B precisely because there is more habitat in the local landscape around Patch A than in the local landscape around Patch B. & Nieminen 2002, Bender et al. 2003, Tischendorf et al. 2003, Prugh 2009, Ranius et al. 2010, Thornton et al. 2011, Martin & Fahrig 2012; Figure 3).”
Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis (2013, background): “…with it) best predicts patch immigration rate and related ecological responses (Moilanen & Nieminen, 2002; Bender et al., 2003; Tischendorf et al., 2003; Prugh, 2009; Ranius et al., 2010; Figure 2 in Thornton et al., 2011; Martin & Fahrig, 2012), including species richness (Piessens et al., 2004).”
Anthropogenic modulators of species–area relationships in Neotropical primates: a continental‐scale analysis of fragmented forest landscapes (2013, result): “This is consistent with other studies showing that hunting pressure vastly accelerates species loss from tropical forest fragments (Peres, 2001; Thornton et al., 2011).”