Economic Policy, Distribution and Poverty: The Nature of Disagreements

By Ravi Kanbur. 2001

432 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b06d577215d30c63f8806b3e390592b05df9664

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

GROWTH, INEQUALITY AND POVERTY: SOME HARD QUESTIONS (2004, background): “16 Some of these questions are raised in Kanbur (2001, 2002).”
Aid and Development (2006, background): “While resource allocation is at the very core of economics, lack of consensus about key causal relationships and the appropriate levels of aggregation and time perspective are pronounced in the aid literature (Kanbur, 2001).”
Solutions When the Solution is the Problem: Arraying the Disarray in Development (2004, background): “4 Despite appearances to the contrary, the factions in contemporary development debates share a fair degree of consensus (cf. Kanbur, 2001).”
Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: A New Convergence (2003, background): “Nor is it to side entirely with civil society advocates (Kanbur 2001), insofar as they might argue that more democratic contest and participation will routinely mean better outcomes.”
The Emergence and Persistence of Inequality in Premodern Societies (2010, background): “…respect we converge with the work of social scientists engaged with poverty alleviation who emphasize the nonincome dimensions to poverty such as longevity, literacy, and health, given that the poor generally live shorter and less healthy lives and enjoy less education than the rich (Kanbur 2001).”
Economics, Social Science and Development (2002, background): “As reported in Kanbur (2001c), it was first of all recognized that “Qualitative” and “Quantitative” signified a continuum of cases, along (at least) five dimensions: 1.”
To Make Live or Let Die? Rural Dispossession and the Protection of Surplus Populations (2010, background): “…Declaration on Economic and Social Rights, including a right to food, and a “rights-based approach” to development, sits awkwardly alongside the IFIs, convinced that sacrifice is necessary in order to promote growth, from which the poor will eventually benefit (Kanbur 2001; United Nations 2007).”
Exploring Social Capital Debates at the World Bank (2004, background): “The micro and macro-politics surrounding the writing of the report (manifest not only in Kanbur’s resignation [Kanbur, 2001] but also SOCIAL CAPITAL DEBATES AT THE WORLD BANK 49”
Increasing the contribution of small-scale fisheries to poverty alleviation and food security (2007, background): “The case of protected areas is in this respect a good illustration of a wider debate in development: the time scale at which the outcomes are considered (Moseley, 2001; Kanbur, 2001).”
The New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD): An initial commentary (2002, background): “…Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press). http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/sk145/papers/ evolution of thinking about poverty.pdf; Ravi Kanbur (June 2001), ‘Economic Policy, Distribution and Poverty: The Nature of Disagreements’, World Development,…”
Globalisation, Education and Development: Ideas, Actors and Dynamics (2007, background): “Here the most prominent reasons for this shift appear to be the direct and indirect consequences of the failure of the Structural Adjustment Programs of the 1990s (see Stiglitz, 2002; Kanbur, 2001) and the East Asian financial crisis (Stiglitz, 2002).”