Solutions When the Solution is the Problem: Arraying the Disarray in Development
By L. Pritchett, M. Woolcock. 2004
707 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07604aa6d7e8bf19fe4e8ed783ffd167ceed4dee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
In Soil Science
- Christopher B. Barrett
- John Mcpeak
- David R. Lee
- A. Ibáñez
- Matt Andrews
- J. Ribot
- Michael R. Carter
- J. Skees
Citations in the corpus
- The Politics of Public Services: A Service Characteristics Approach (2015, background): “It is therefore difficult to specify in detail sufficient to be monitored, the way in which teachers are expected to operate (Pritchett & Woolcock, 2004).”
- Institutional Arrangements for Rural Poverty Reduction and Resource Conservation (2005, background): “When scientists develop technical prescriptions through careful, controlled experimentation, then apply those recommendations widely, with little regard to local conditions, successful outcomes prove spotty at best (Ghimire & Pimbert, 1997; Ostrom, 1990; Pritchett & Woolcock, 2003).”
- The Good Governance Agenda: Beyond Indicators without Theory (2008, background): “…of Pritchett and Woolcock’s worry that thinking based on such examples poses a problem in development: “Simply mimicking . . . the organizational forms of a particular ‘Denmark’—has in fact been a root cause of deep problems encountered by developing countries” (Pritchett & Woolcock, 2004, p. 193).”