Selecting marine reserve locations : Optimality versus opportunism

By C. Roberts. 2000

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ab8d00872242e59ef2f2548de5e403b232e6e02

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. C. Speed
2. M. Heupel
3. C. Simpfendorfer
4. D. Knip
5. I. Field
6. M. Meekan
7. Christopher G. Lowe
8. Darin T. Topping

Citations in the corpus

• MARINE RESERVE DESIGN AND THE EVOLUTION OF SIZE AT MATURATION IN HARVESTED FISH (2005, background): “Specifically, MPAs may reduce fisheries uncertainty on two levels (Roberts 2000): they may reduce variability in catch caused by the environmental uncertainty inherent to marine species with open population dynamics (Sladek Nowlis and Roberts 1999, Mangel 2000a, b), and they may reduce the…”
• The importance of habitat quality for marine reserve fishery linkages (2003, background): “The rate and extent of fish biomass buildup or biodiversity in reserves can be hindered by poor quality habitat (Roberts 2000a).”
• Complexities of coastal shark movements and their implications for management (2010, background): “The reason being, that marine protected areas might only be effective if the vulnerable age classes of a species are resident for long enough during their life cycle (Roberts 2000).”
• Evaluating marine protected areas for the conservation of tropical coastal sharks (2012, background): “Due to the urgent need for protection in marine environments, many MPAs have been implemented opportunistically without prior knowledge of how they will function (Roberts, 2000).”
• Reassessing the value of nursery areas to shark conservation and management (2009, background): “Instead, MPAs could be used to protect some sharks during certain life stages, such as younger age classes within nursery areas (Bonfil 1999; Roberts 2000; Heupel & Simpfendorfer 2005).”
• Designing, implementing and managing marine protected areas: emerging trends and opportunities for coral reef nations (2011, methodology): “Approaches to designing and implementing MPAs lie on a continuum between systematic planning at regional (or national) scales with top-down implementation, and community-based, bottom-up implementation (also called opportunistic, ad hoc, or local) (Roberts, 2000; Pressey and Bottrill, 2008) (Table 1”
• Considering the temporal when managing the spatial: a population range expansion impacts protected areas‐based management for bottlenose dolphins (2004, background): “Such schemes are appropriate for site-faithful or sessile species but less so for highly mobile ones (Roberts, 2000).”
• Effects of Noncompliance on the Success of Alternative Designs of Marine Protected‐Area Networks for Conservation and Fisheries Management (2004, background): “…attention in the conservation and fisheries literature as a management strategy that can achieve multiple objectives, particularly for reef-dwelling fishes and invertebrates (reviewed by Roberts & Polunin 1991; Dugan & Davis 1993; Guenette et al. 1998; Roberts 2000; Roberts et al. 2001; Russ 2002).”
• Movement patterns, home range, and habitat utilization of adult kelp bass Paralabrax clathratus in a temperate no-take marine reserve (2003, background): “Kelp bass Paralabrax clathratus is a popular food and gamefish found around nearshore rocky reefs and kelp habitats from Baja California to Monterey Bay, California (Quast 1968, Miller & Lea 1972).”