Evaluating marine protected areas for the conservation of tropical coastal sharks

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks (2016, unknown): “(2015) found that 65% of these could benefit sharks, while 35% suggested no-take zones were too small to offer protection given the scale of shark movement (e.g. Chapman et al. 2005; Heupel et al. 2010; Barnett et al., 2011; Bond et al., 2012; Knip et al., 2012).”
Migratory marine species: their status, threats and conservation management needs (2014, background): “Research at the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park showed that the time reef sharks spent in the MPA varied seasonally (Knip et al., 2012).”
Global economic value of shark ecotourism: implications for conservation (2013, background): “This is especially true of species that aggregate near reefs or other fixed locations that can be designated as marine protected areas, providing a safe haven for shark populations at local and regional scales (Sala et al., 2002; Knip et al., 2012).”
The Use of Electronic Tags in Fish Research - An Overview of Fish Telemetry Methods (2013, background): “…(FADs) (Mitsanuga et al., 2013), homing ability after displacements (Mitamura et al., 2012), evaluation efficiency of marine protected areas (Knip et al., 2012), harvest selection of behavioural traits (Olsen et al., 2012), effects of water pollution (Thorstad et al., 2013b) and movements…”