Creativity and mathematics education: the state of the art

By R. Leikin, D. Pitta-Pantazi. 2013

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a9952e1b6b7426e209e6217bab34bd90f912f04

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Maike Schindler
2. Benjamin Rott
3. Julia Joklitschke

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Maike Schindler
2. Benjamin Rott
3. Julia Joklitschke

Citations in the corpus

• A Study on the Development of a Mathematics Creativity Scale. (2016, background): “In addition to its complexity in definition, some experts think that mathematical creativity is not achievable because of the unfavorable approaches of conventional education to teaching creativity (Meissner, 2005).”
• Notions of Creativity in Mathematics Education Research: a Systematic Literature Review (2021, background): “…for their present and future lives in increasingly automated and interconnected societies and economies (OECD, 2014)—and, in turn, mathematics education research often addresses creativity (see, e.g. Leikin & Pitta-Pantazi, 2013; Schindler & Lilienthal, 2020; Sheffield, 2013; Singer, 2018).”