Meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies of the Wisconsin Card‐Sorting task and component processes
By B. Buchsbaum, Stephanie Greer, Wei‐li Chang, Karen Faith Berman. 2005
483 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Michael J Frank
- Angela R. Laird
- And U. Turken
- Thomas V. Wiecki
- Victoria Ashley
- Diane Swick
- Adam R. Aron
- Peter T. Fox
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- K. Tye
- James J. Pekar
- Victoria Ashley
- Russell A. Poldrack
- Robert C. Wilson
- Peter T. Fox
- Samuel J. Gershman
- Daniel J. Simmonds
Citations in the corpus
- A modeling framework for adaptive lifelong learning with transfer and savings through gating in the prefrontal cortex (2020, methodology): “Our lesion studies motivate further investigation of functional specialization in the PFC through comparison of our framework and clinical, experimental, and neuroimaging studies (2, 5).”
- Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus (2006, background): “Although No-Go activates right IFC just as Stopping does (for review, see Aron and Poldrack, 2005; Buchsbaum et al., 2005), and lesions of monkey homologues of IFC affect No-Go (Iversen and Mishkin, 1970; Petrides, 1986) just as lesions of right IFC affect SSRT in humans (Aron et al., 2003a;…”
- Response Inhibition and Response Selection: Two Sides of the Same Coin (2008, methodology): “A meta-analysis including such studies revealed a region of concurrence in the right IFC, in addition to concurrence in the pre-SMA (Buchsbaum et al., 2005).”
- Triangulating a Cognitive Control Network Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Functional MRI (2007, background): “Neurophysiological, lesion, and imaging studies also implicate the right IFC in stopping in the related Go/NoGo paradigm (for review, see Aron et al., 2004; Buchsbaum et al., 2005; Garavan et al., 2006; Sakagami et al., 2006) The right IFC, or some other frontal region, may block the execution of th”
- Behavioural Brain Research (2016, unknown): “Testing began shortly after completion of Experiment 1.”
- A computational model of inhibitory control in frontal cortex and basal ganglia. (2011, background): “e emphasized the role of the hyperdirect pathway from pre-SMA to the STN, which delays responding during con ict-based decision making, the rIFG also projects directly to the STN (Aron et al., 2004a; Buchsbaum et al., 2005; Chambers et al., 2006; Rieger et al., 2003) and can issue a braking signal t”
- Body mass correlates inversely with inhibitory control in response to food among adolescent girls: An fMRI study (2010, unknown): “As noted, these different regions are part of a distributed frontal lobe inhibitory control network and have been commonly implicated in response inhibition during go/no-go tasks (Buchsbaum et al., 2005; Liddle et al., 2001; Mostofsky et al., 2003; Simmonds et al., 2008; Aron and Poldrack, 2005; Hor”
- Brainmap taxonomy of experimental design: Description and evaluation (2005, methodology): “Stuttering study Expt: context Disease effects 1 A Stuttering study Paper: subjects: diagnosis Developmental stuttering 1 A Overt reading Expt: paradigm class Reading (overt) 1 A Stuttering task Paper: prose description — 2 C Buchsbaum et al., 2005”
- Activation of Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus during Response Inhibition across Response Modalities (2007, methodology): “The frontal and parietal activation during the performance of the present modified antisaccade task, particularly the rIFG activation, agrees well with previous studies using the manual go/no-go task (Buchsbaum et al., 2005; Nakata et al., 2005; Rubia et al., 2005; Matsubara et al., 2004; Aron et al”
- Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. (2008, methodology): “Several tasks used to study inhibition during fMRI such as the Wisconsin Cart Sorting Task and the Stroop task involve additional cognitive processes necessary to guide response inhibition, including stimulus‐response conflict, learning, working memory and shifting attention ( Buchsbaum, Greer, Chan”