A modeling framework for adaptive lifelong learning with transfer and savings through gating in the prefrontal cortex

By Ben Tsuda, K. Tye, Hava T. Siegelmann, Terrence J. Sejnowski. 2020

52 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Significance The prefrontal cortex (PFC) enables humans’ ability to flexibly adapt to new environments and circumstances. Disruption of this ability is often a hallmark of prefrontal disease. Neural network models have provided tools to study how the PFC stores and uses information, yet the mechanisms underlying how the PFC is able to adapt and learn about new situations without disrupting preexisting knowledge remain unknown. We use a neural network architecture to show how hierarchical gating can naturally support adaptive learning while preserving memories from prior experience. Furthermore, we show how damage to our network model recapitulates disorders of the human PFC. The prefrontal cortex encodes and stores numerous, often disparate, schemas and flexibly switches between them. Recent research on artificial neural networks trained by reinforcement learning has made it possible to model fundamental processes underlying schema encoding and storage. Yet how the brain is able to create new schemas while preserving and utilizing old schemas remains unclear. Here we propose a simple neural network framework that incorporates hierarchical gating to model the prefrontal cortex’s ability to flexibly encode and use multiple disparate schemas. We show how gating naturally leads to transfer learning and robust memory savings. We then show how neuropsychological impairments observed in patients with prefrontal damage are mimicked by lesions of our network. Our architecture, which we call DynaMoE, provides a fundamental framework for how the prefrontal cortex may handle the abundance of schemas necessary to navigate the real world.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Meta & Continual Learning, Neuroscience

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Sebastian Risi
  2. Andrea Soltoggio
  3. Jeff Clune
  4. Risto Miikkulainen
  5. J. Krichmar
  6. Maria R. Cervera
  7. Gido M. van de Ven
  8. Liyuan Wang

In Meta & Continual Learning

  1. Liyuan Wang
  2. Zsolt Kira
  3. Gido M. van de Ven
  4. Johannes von Oswald
  5. Christian Henning
  6. Benjamin F. Grewe
  7. Xingxing Zhang
  8. Jun Zhu

In Neuroscience

  1. Gido M. van de Ven
  2. Andreas S. Tolias
  3. Sebastian Risi
  4. Liyuan Wang
  5. Jun Zhu
  6. Xingxing Zhang
  7. Hang Su
  8. Maxim Bazhenov

Citations in the corpus