The structure of voids

By Stefan Gottloeber, E. Lokas, Anatoly Klypin, Yehuda Hoffman Aip, C. Center, Nmsu, R. I. O. Physics. 2003

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Using high resolution N-body simulations we address the problem of emptiness of giant � 20h −1 Mpc–diameter voids found in the distribution of bright galaxies. Are the voids filled by dwarf galaxies? Do cosmological models predict too many small dark matter haloes inside the voids? Can the problems of cosmological models on small scales be addressed by studying the abundance of dwarf galaxies inside voids? We find that voids in the distribution of 10 12 h −1 M⊙ haloes (expected galactic magnitudes � M∗) are almost the same as the voids in 10 11 h −1 M⊙ haloes. Yet, much smaller haloes with masses 10 9 h −1 M⊙ and circular velocities vcirc � 20 km/s readily fill the voids: there should be almost 1000 of these haloes in a 20h −1 Mpc–diameter void. A typical void of diameter 20h −1 Mpc contains about 50 haloes with vcirc > 50 km/s. The haloes are arranged in a pattern, which looks like a miniature Universe: it has the same structural elements as the large-scale structure of the galactic distribution of the Universe. There are filaments and voids; larger haloes are at the intersections of filaments. The only difference is that all masses are four orders of magnitude smaller. There is severe (anti)bias in the distribution of haloes, which depends on halo mass and on the distance from the centre of the void. Large haloes are more antibiased and have a tendency to form close to void boundaries. The mass function of haloes in voids is different from the “normal” mass function. It is much steeper for high masses resulting in very few M33-type galaxies (vcirc � 100 km/s). We present an analytical approximation for the mass function of haloes in voids.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a162a4e2e6ff89fe5df6cfadd41a0af89372868

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. Carlos S. Frenk
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  7. F. V. D. Bosch
  8. A. Benson

In Instrumentation

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. Carlos S. Frenk
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. A. Benson
  7. F. V. D. Bosch
  8. Jeremiah P. Ostriker

Citations in the corpus