A cosmic watershed: the WVF void detection technique

By Erwin Platen, Rien van de Weygaert, Bernard J. T. Jones. 2007

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

On megaparsec scales the Universe is permeated by an intricate filigree of clusters, filaments, sheets and voids, the cosmic web. For the understanding of its dynamical and hierarchical history it is crucial to identify objectively its complex morphological components. One of the most characteristic aspects is that of the dominant underdense voids, the product of a hierarchical process driven by the collapse of minor voids in addition to the merging of large ones. In this study we present an objective void finder technique which involves a minimum of assumptions about the scale, structure and shape of voids. Our void finding method, the watershed void finder (WVF), is based upon the watershed transform, a well-known technique for the segmentation of images. Importantly, the technique has the potential to trace the existing manifestations of a void hierarchy. The basic watershed transform is augmented by a variety of correction procedures to remove spurious structure resulting from sampling noise. This study contains a detailed description of the WVF. We demonstrate how it is able to trace and identify, relatively parameter free, voids and their surrounding (filamentary and planar) boundaries. We test the technique on a set of kinematic Voronoi models, heuristic spatial models for a cellular distribution of matter. Comparison of the WVF segmentations of low-noise and high-noise Voronoi models with the quantitatively known spatial characteristics of the intrinsic Voronoi tessellation shows that the size and shape of the voids are successfully retrieved. WVF manages to even reproduce the full void size distribution function.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ecology, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7630a1133b49247702f231e2450912decfe715c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Volker Springel
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. Thierry Sousbie
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. J. Devriendt
  6. C. Pichon
  7. Y. Dubois
  8. Andrey V. Kravtsov

In Ecology

  1. Thierry Sousbie
  2. Mark Neyrinck
  3. Marius Cautun
  4. Rien van de Weygaert
  5. Carlos S. Frenk
  6. Bernard J. T. Jones
  7. Miguel Angel Aragon-Calvo
  8. Francisco-Shu Kitaura

In Instrumentation

  1. Thierry Sousbie
  2. Y. Dubois
  3. Volker Springel
  4. J. Devriendt
  5. C. Pichon
  6. Simon D. M. White
  7. A. Slyz
  8. Mark Neyrinck

Citations in the corpus