Análise de Mediação, Moderação e Processos Condicionais

By P. H. M. Prado, J. Korelo, Danielle Mantovani Lucena da Silva. 2014

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper discusses the main aspects of simple mediation and moderation, as well as the conditional process analysis applied for more complex models, such as mediated moderation and moderated mediation. The recent changes on the way these analysis have been conducted highlights the need to discuss them in order to increase their application in studies conducted in Brazil. The authors provide a discussion about the analysis techniques and the recommendations for the procedures conducted these days. They also present the direct, indirect and total effects and how to read them. Finally, the conditional process analysis, applied for moderated mediation and mediated moderation analysis procedures, is discussed.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99feaba1c14bd4c91b8a469e5420858fb5677e95

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

In Urban Studies

Citations in the corpus

Under the Influence: Social Media Influencers’ Impact on Response to Corporate Reputation Advertising (2021, methodology): “Hypotheses 4(a) and 4(b) were tested with a simple mediation model using the bootstrapping procedure (5,000 samples) of PROCESS macro, Model 4 (Hayes 2013), after controlling for the effect of initial attitudes, brand familiarity, and education.”
Sexual Objectification Increases Rape Victim Blame and Decreases Perceived Suffering (2013, methodology): “Following the protocols of Hayes (2013), we used accelerated and bias-corrected bootstrapping for indirect effects to test the path from condition to blame via moral concern, which revealed a significant indirect effect as indicated by a 95% confidence interval that did not include 0 [.02, 1.05].”