Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics

By David I. Beaver. 2001

606 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99f4e42460635b40e541b2a1055f74c383e99d1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Maximize Presupposition! and local contexts (2011, background): “Empirical observations might also help constrain the problem, with potentially relevant considerations coming from anaphora (e.g., Heim (1982)), modals (e.g., Beaver (2001)), and, if we are right, antipresuppositions, as well.”
Predicting the presuppositions of soft triggers (2011, background): “Such effects have been recently discussed in Beaver (2004) and Kadmon (2001).”
Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste* (2005, background): “Beaver (2001) Ch. 9 also provides some interesting relevant discussion.”
Toward a Taxonomy of Projective Content (2013, background): “15 The projection property is characterized using the possibility modal may since many projective contents do not obligatorily project; see, for example, Beaver 2001:Ch. 3 for discussion.”
What is Presupposition Accommodation, Again? (2008, background): “So, Beaver’s model seems entirely appropriate to those kinds of situations.”
Presupposition projection from quantificational sentences: trivalence, local accommodation, and presupposition strengthening (2013, background): “The following (based on the combination of manipulations suggested by Beaver 2001 and Schlenker 2008a) illustrates the point.”
The logic of conventional implicatures (2004, background): “2.4.3.3 Cancellation under special operators There is a class of cases in which expected conventional presuppositions do not arise (Beaver 2001:§1; Kadmon 2001:§6).”
Connectives without truth tables (2012, background): “9See e.g., Soames (1989); Heim (1990); Beaver (2001) for background on presupposition, which is mainly taken for granted here.”
Sentic patterns: Dependency-based rules for concept-level sentiment analysis (2014, background): “Presupposition is probably the most studied phenomenon of this kind: both versions of (8) convey that John killed his wife, even though the second version is the negation of the first one ([46,47]).”
Presuppositions of quantified sentences: experimental data (2009, background): “On the other hand, Beaver (1994, 2001) and (as a first approximation) DRT accounts of presuppositions a ` la van der Sandt (1992) argue that sentences like (2)/(3) trigger only much weaker existential presuppositions as schematized in (2b): some individual satisfying the restrictor also satisfies ”