Toward a Taxonomy of Projective Content
By Judith Tonhauser, David I. Beaver, Craige Roberts, Mandy Simons. 2013
300 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Projective contents, which include presuppositional inferences and Potts's (2005) conventional implicatures, are contents that may project when a construction is embedded, as standardly identified by the FAMILY-OF-SENTENCES diagnostic (e.g. Chierchia & McConnell-Ginet 1990). This article establishes distinctions among projective contents on the basis of a series of diagnostics, including a variant of the family-of-sentences diagnostic, that can be applied with linguistically untrained consultants in the field and the laboratory. These diagnostics are intended to serve as part of a toolkit for exploring projective contents across languages, thus allowing generalizations to be examined and validated crosslinguistically. We apply the diagnostics in two languages, focusing on Paraguayan Guaraní (Tupí-Guaraní), and comparing the results to those for English. Our study of Paraguayan Guaraní is the first systematic exploration of projective content in a language other than English. Based on the application of our diagnostics to a wide range of constructions, four subclasses of projective contents emerge. The resulting taxonomy of projective content has strong implications for contemporary theories of projection (e.g. Karttunen 1974, Heim 1983, van der Sandt 1992, Potts 2005, Schlenker 2009), which were developed for the projective properties of particular subclasses and fail to generalize to the full set of projective contents.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/754915eafa435e7e9c510776ce61486e9624d3fa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- The semantic roots of positive polarity: epistemic modal verbs and adverbs in English, Greek and Italian (2018, background): “In more philosophical works it has been claimed that "iterating epistemic possibility operators adds no value in the semantics" (Yalcin 2007: 994), or "embedding an epistemic modal under another epistemic modal does not in general have any interesting semantic effects" (Willer 2013: 12).”