Presuppositions of quantified sentences: experimental data
By Emmanuel Chemla. 2009
186 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea63ff072b61cc96e9dd8cbef7fbdeafe18c8497
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Language and Linguistics
- Danny Fox
- Jacopo Romoli
- Florian Schwarz
- Emmanuel Chemla
- Manuel Križ
- Robert van Rooij
- Luka Crnič
- Shoichi Takahashi
In Philosophy
- Danny Fox
- Jacopo Romoli
- Florian Schwarz
- Emmanuel Chemla
- Manuel Križ
- Robert van Rooij
- Luka Crnič
- Raj Singh
Citations in the corpus
- Universal Implicatures and Free Choice Effects: Experimental Data (2009, methodology): “20 See Abrusán (2009) and Chemla (2009a).”
- An Experimental Comparison Between Presuppositions and Indirect Scalar Implicatures (2015, background): “See Chemla 2009a; Romoli 2012, Romoli (to appear) for scalar implicature-based account of presuppositions, which do make additional assumptions for deriving their projection behavior.”
- Two methods to find truth-value gaps and their application to the projection problem of homogeneity (2015, background): “• Chemla and George (2015), investigating a suspected presupposition of agree with a wh-complement, asked speakers separately for true/false judgments about positive and negated sentences.”
- Presupposition projection from quantificational sentences: trivalence, local accommodation, and presupposition strengthening (2013, background): “Chemla (2009) presented evidence that the presupposition depends on the choice of quantifier, that for some quantifiers a universal presupposition is too strong, but for others an existential presupposition is too weak.”
- Children interpret disjunction as conjunction: Consequences for theories of implicature and child development (2016, unknown): “…strengthening, so that only an inclusive disjunction reading is expected, whereas (7), when coupled with some theories of STR (Fox 2007, as well as Chemla 2009a and Franke 2011), predicts the possibility of a conjunctive strengthening.9 8This assumption builds on Chierchia et al. (2001), Gualmini…”