The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from nestedness, and nestedness

By A. Baselga. 2012

836 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99b2c9ac635ae292c5934ea191bca192e5f1b59e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects (2015, neutral): “High environmental heterogeneity was also the likely explanation for the greater importance of species turnover than nestedness (resultant from species richness differences; Baselga, 2012) in driving beta diversity.”
The impact of even‐aged and uneven‐aged forest management on regional biodiversity of multiple taxa in European beech forests (2018, methodology): “We quantified β- diversity as a multiple- site turnover component of Jaccard dissimilarity (Baselga, 2012) based on 200 resamplings of nine plots per forest management system.”
Functional homogenization exceeds taxonomic homogenization among European fish assemblages (2014, methodology): “We used the frameworks of Baselga (2012) and Villéger et al.”
Partitioning taxon, phylogenetic and functional beta diversity into replacement and richness difference components (2014, methodology): “Pioneering work in beta diversity partitioning was conducted by Baselga (2010), who suggested partitioning Tb into turnover and nestednessresultant dissimilarity fractions, as derived from both the Sørensen and Jaccard indices (Baselga, 2010, 2012).”
On the meanings of nestedness: back to the basics (2012, background): “Because PRN is generally the 1-complement of species replacement, it equates nestedness (the joint contribution of richness difference and species overlap) with the pairwise sum of species among sites (see Baselga 2012 for further considerations on this issue).”
Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity (2014, methodology): “1 are found in several papers (e.g. Williams, 1996; Baselga, 2010, 2012; Podani & Schmera, 2011; Carvalho et al., 2013).”
Comparing methods to separate components of beta diversity (2015, methodology): “2001) and the turnover component of Jaccard dissimilarity (Baselga 2012), as well as their abundance-based (Baselga 2013; Legendre 2014), phylogenetic (Leprieur et al.”
Assembly mechanisms determining high species turnover in aquatic communities over regional and continental scales (2016, methodology): “We first calculated the multiple-site Sorensen’s index of beta-diversity, as well as its turnover and nestedness components (Baselga 2010, 2012), at two different scales: among lakes within regions (regional scale) and among all lakes (continental scale).”
Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding and underwater visual census to monitor tropical reef fishes (2020, methodology): “We applied the partitioning framework proposed by Baselga (2012), which consists of decomposing β jac, into two additive components, replacement and nestedness.”
Beta diversity of diatom species and ecological guilds: Response to environmental and spatial mechanisms along the stream watercourse (2018, methodology): “As bnes does not quantify how strong the nestedness pattern is (Baselga, 2010, 2012), we also calculated a nestedness metric (from both row and column values), based on overlap and decreasing fill (NODF, Almeida-Neto, Guimar~aes, Guimar~aes, Loyola, & Ulrich, 2008), to better assess nestedness in…”
The origin of urban communities: From the regional species pool to community assemblages in city (2020, methodology): “We then assess the relative importance of taxonomic and functional turnover and nestedness among UGS using the beta diversity decomposition by Baselga (2010, 2012) and Villéger, Grenouillet, and Brosse (2013).”
Partitioning abundance‐based multiple‐site dissimilarity into components: balanced variation in abundance and abundance gradients (2017, neutral): “In both cases, the substitution and subset components of total dissimilarity can be separated (Baselga 2010, 2012, 2013b; Legendre 2014; Baselga & Leprieur 2015).”
Multiple site dissimilarity quantifies compositional heterogeneity among several sites, while average pairwise dissimilarity may be misleading (2013, background): “…co-occurrence among more than two sites and 2) partitioning overall biotic heterogeneity into turnover and nestedness components, two families of multiple site measures derived from S ø rensen ( β SOR β SIM β SNE ) and Jaccard indices ( β JAC β JTU β JNE ) have been developed (Baselga 2010b, 2012).”
Beta diversity of plants, birds and butterflies is closely associated with climate and habitat structure (2017, background): “The value of bSIM represents a richness-independent measure of replacement differences in species composition, whereas bSNE represents a measure sensitive to species gains or losses (Baselga, 2010, 2012).”