Functional homogenization exceeds taxonomic homogenization among European fish assemblages

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Species invasions threaten the antiquity of China's freshwater fish fauna (2017, result): “To account for differences in establishment success among non-native species, species from the potential non-native species pool were randomly added to watersheds following the ‘frequency-dependent’ assumption (Vill eger et al., 2015), or in other words, the probability of invasion was weighted by i”
The Homogocene: a research prospectus for the study of biotic homogenisation (2018, background): “Studies comparing patterns in taxonomic and functional homogenisation have been particularly intuitive in this regard (e.g. Smart et al. 2006, Pool and Olden 2012, Sonnier et al. 2014, Villéger et al. 2014).”
How many dimensions are needed to accurately assess functional diversity? A pragmatic approach for assessing the quality of functional spaces (2015, background): “…a lower dimensionality can have practical advantages, such as computing time for functional diversity indices (e.g. functional beta-diversity indices; Villéger et al., 2014) or feasibility of graphical outputs (e.g. visualizing the distribution of species in four-dimensional functional space…”
Traits Without Borders: Integrating Functional Diversity Across Scales. (2016, background): “The extension to functional dissimilarity considers the overlapping and non-overlapping fractions of the convex hull-based hypervolumes of the considered communities [29,78].”