Partitioning taxon, phylogenetic and functional beta diversity into replacement and richness difference components
By Pedro Cardoso, F. Rigal, José Carlos Carvalho, Mikael Fortelius, P. Borges, János Podani, Dénes Schmera. 2014
240 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a3ef54727da679e3c98125860a920243bf99526
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Pierre Legendre
- A. Baselga
- Fabien Leprieur
- Pedro Cardoso
- José Carlos Carvalho
- F. Rigal
- Hanna Tuomisto
- J. Soininen
In Ecology
- Pierre Legendre
- Fabien Leprieur
- A. Baselga
- Pedro Cardoso
- F. Rigal
- José Carlos Carvalho
- S. Brosse
- Hanna Tuomisto
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Pierre Legendre
- A. Baselga
- Fabien Leprieur
- Pedro Cardoso
- José Carlos Carvalho
- F. Rigal
- J. Heino
- J. Soininen
Citations in the corpus
- BAT – Biodiversity Assessment Tools, an R package for the measurement and estimation of alpha and beta taxon, phylogenetic and functional diversity (2015, methodology): “All these approaches were first developed for TD and only recently adapted for other dimensions of biodiversity, namely PD andFD (Cardoso et al. 2014a).”
- Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity (2014, background): “The indices can also be modified to incorporate phylogenetic information about species relatedness (Leprieur et al., 2012; Cardoso et al., 2014).”
- Comparing methods to separate components of beta diversity (2015, background): “In turn, a new name should be given to those indices depending both on species replacement and richness difference, as those derived from the POD framework (Podani & Schmera 2011; Carvalho, Cardoso & Gomes 2012; Cardoso et al. 2014; Legendre 2014).”