Cognitive appraisals associated with high trait anger

By Jacobus F Hazebroek, K. Howells, A. Day. 2001

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9990168f6dba43b5637db71e1cdcdb8378d4886a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Peter Kuppens
2. A. Day
3. I. Van Mechelen
4. K. Howells
5. S. Wright
6. Dirk Smits
7. P. De Boeck
8. Paul J Silvia

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Peter Kuppens
2. I. Van Mechelen
3. A. Day
4. Eva Ceulemans
5. Dirk Smits
6. P. De Boeck
7. Paul J Silvia

In Social Psychology

1. Peter Kuppens
2. I. Van Mechelen
3. A. Day
4. K. Howells
5. Eva Ceulemans
6. Dirk Smits
7. P. De Boeck
8. Paul J Silvia

Citations in the corpus

• AFFECT, EMOTIONS AND SEX OFFENDING (2004, background): “The event and the state become subject to cognitive interpretations and constructions (Novaco and Welsh, 1989, Power and Dalgleish, 1997; Hazebroek et al. , 2001).”
• Interactional appraisal models for the anger appraisals of threatened self-esteem, other-blame, and frustration (2007, methodology): “For instance, prior research suggests that individual differences in other-blame are most prominent in situations that are ambiguous with respect to the role of the other person (e.g., Dill, Anderson, Anderson, & Deuser, 1997; Hazebroek et al., 2001; Trachtenberg & Viken, 1994).”
• Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience (2007, background): “Appraisal tendencies, however, have received only scant attention in empirical research until now (for some exceptions, see Dodge, 1993 ; Hazebroek, Howells, & Day, 2001 ; Hemenover & Dienstbier, 1996 ).”