Religion and social preferences: An experimental study

By Jonathan H. W. Tan. 2006

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/996c787a6675db71f34ebe266678b638a448e463

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In General Decision Sciences

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Religion and trust: an experimental study (2008, background): “Existing research has tested the predictive power of questionnaires on economic behavior such as in Berg et al.’s (1995) trust game (e.g., General Social Survey: Glaeser et al., 2000, and; Machiavelianism scale: Gunnthorsdottir et al., 2002), and Dictator and Ultimatum games (Multi-dimensional Relig”
Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments (2010, unknown): “An example of this is Tan (2006) , who wished to verify the connection between questionnaire and behavioral responses and had these measured in different sessions separated in time.”
The role of Islamic religiosity on the relationship between perceived value and tourist satisfaction (2015, methodology): “…previous work has shown that religiosity includes other dimensions, for example, those of ‘communities’ (Marks & Dollahite, 2001), ‘organizations’ (Krause, 1993), ‘experience’ (Tan, 2006), ‘spirituality’ (Duriez et al., 2000), ‘affect’ (Cornwall et al., 1986) and ‘experiential’ (Caird, 1987).”
Preferences for Redistribution (2009, background): “Religious affiliation and participation in religious services (elicited with a multi-item questionnaire) yields no significant influence on social preferences in an experimental setting (Tan (2006)).”
Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: a case study from Mauritius (2013, unknown): “…2004; Grossman & Parrett, 2011; Johansson-Stenman, Mahmud, & Martinsson, 2009; Malhotra, 2010; Orbell et al., 1992; Spilka, Hood, Hunsberger, & Gorsuch, 2003; Tan, 2006), or can be attributed to other factors such as in-group bias (Bulbulia & Mahoney, 2008; Sosis & Ruffle, 2003; Tan & Vogel, 2008).”