Religion and trust: an experimental study

By Jonathan H. W. Tan, C. Vogel. 2008

332 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62747a7e9fef0253ddbe53e515f97e151fe32512

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

In Advertising We Trust: Religiosity's Influence on Marketplace and Relational Trust (2015, background): “Stronger religious beliefs are shown to lead to greater levels of trust in social situations (Bahr and Martin 1983; B egue 2002; Schoenfeld 1978; Tan and Vogel 2008).”
Beliefs about God, the afterlife and morality support the role of supernatural policing in human cooperation (2011, background): “Experimental work indicates that religious individuals are also both more trusting and more trusted in cooperative economic games (Tan & Vogel, 2008).”
Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them (2010, background): “14 Tan and Vogel (2008) find a positive association between religious belief and amount sent.”
The evolution of religion and morality: a synthesis of ethnographic and experimental evidence from eight societies (2017, unknown): “…responses to problems of trust and cooperation (Purzycki & Arakchaa, 2013; Soler, 2012; Sosis, 2005; Sosis & Bressler, 2003; Sosis & Ruffle, 2003; Tan & Vogel, 2008; Xygalatas et al., 2013) and/or coordination of resources (Bliege Bird, Tayor, Codding, & Bird, 2013; Lansing, 1987, 2007; Lansing…”
Discerning devotion: Testing the signaling theory of religion (2017, background): “493 The results reported here extend experimental work showing that reli494 gious individuals are often perceived as more trustworthy (Hall et al., 2015; 495 McCullough et al., 2015; Purzycki and Arakchaa, 2013; Ruffle and Sosis, 496 2010; Tan and Vogel, 2008; Widman et al., 2009).”
Principles of Religious Prosociality: A Review and Reformulation (2010, background): “Tan and Vogel (2008) investigated how interactive co-operation may be impacted by the perceived religiousness of the other person.”
Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: a case study from Mauritius (2013, background): “…in both scholarly and folk views of religion that religious people are more prosocial, and it has been shown that religious people are perceived as more trustworthy (de Dreu, Yzerbyt, & Leyens, 1995; Orbell, Goldman, Mulford, & Dawes, 1992; Saroglou, Pichon, & Trompette, 2005; Tan & Vogel, 2008).”
Religion, spirituality, and altruism (2013, background): “Moreover, participants in general (independently of their religiousness) increase trust and cooperation when they interact with a religious partner, as found in Germany (Tan & Vogel, 2008), Belgium (De Dreu, Yzerbyt, & Leyens, 1995), and Bangladesh (Johansson-Stenman, Mahmud, & Martinsson, 2009).”
In Godlessness We Distrust: Using Social Psychology to Solve the Puzzle of Anti-atheist Prejudice (2013, background): “Therefore, to the extent that people use religiosity as a cue of trustworthiness (e.g., Tan & Vogel, 2008), anti-atheist prejudice should be primarily evident in the domain of trust, rather than in general antipathy or other specific appraisals.”
Is the importance of religion in daily life related to social trust? Cross-country and cross-state comparisons (2011, background): “Tan and Vogel (2008) report that religious trustees are trusted more, especially by religious trusters.”
Trust games: A meta-analysis (2011, unknown): “…(2007) Austria 68 5.65 54 161 3 U U Sutter and Kocher (2007) Austria 62 5.65 66 137 3 U U U Swope, Cadigan et al. (2008) USA 94 10.00 89 123 3 U U U Tan and Vogel (2008) Germany 48 5.58 35 3 U U U U U U Tanaka, Camerer et al. (2010) Vietnam 110 4.24 29 3 U U U Tanaka, Camerer et al.…”