A Quantitative Survey of Local Adaptation and Fitness Trade‐Offs

By J. Hereford. American Naturalist, 2009

1,169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/995f8f518a8dec0b5808291697c6619ce363e5ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Genetic differentiation and plasticity interact along temperature and precipitation gradients to determine plant performance under climate change (2017, background): “…suggesting the importance of climate for performance of various rare as well as widespread species (e.g. FournierLevel et al. 2011; Bennington et al. 2012; Kim & Donohue 2013; Mendola et al. 2015; Malyshev et al. 2016) and reviews of older studies in Hereford (2009) and Alberto et al. (2013).”
Predicting the Probability of Outbreeding Depression (2011, background): “Some postzygotic reproductive isolation (lower F1, F2, and backcross fitness) may also arise directly from adaptive differentiation (Rundle & Whitlock 2001; Hereford 2009).”
Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence (2014, background): “The most direct test for the adaptive significance of a phenotypic change is to reciprocally transplant individuals between environments (Endler 1986; Kawecki and Ebert 2004; Hereford 2009; Blanquart et al. 2013).”
Lessons on Evolution from the Study of Edaphic Specialization (2017, background): “Colonization of new environments, including edaphic islands, can be achieved by ecotypic differentiation via local adaptation or by phenotypic plasticity (Hereford, 2009; Palacio-López et al., 2015).”
Assisted Gene Flow to Facilitate Local Adaptation to Climate Change (2013, background): “Population pairs compared within studies including climate-based factors and those specifying nonclimatic or no environmental factors did not differ in their probability of showing local adaptation ( p = 0.85 based on a two-sample t-test with archived data from Hereford 2009a).”
It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild. (2009, methodology): “…has been employed by numerous researchers to investigate the strength and direction of selection (see reviews in Endler 1986; Kingsolver et al. 2001; Hoekstra et al. 2001; Hereford et al. 2004), we know surprisingly little about the temporal dynamics of selection in nature (Grant & Grant 2002).”
Genetics in conservation management: Revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses (2014, background): “…environment can contribute to adaptation because they are often beneficial in others: genotype environment interactions (Frankham et al., 2010), including home-site advantage (Hereford, 2009) and adverse fitness effects experience by captive-adapted populations in wild habitats (Frankham, 2008).”
Rapid Evolutionary Change and the Coexistence of Species (2011, background): “Density-dependent processes abound in nature on a variety of spatial scales and can include resource competition, disease, and predation or herbivory (Freckleton & Lewis 2006, Hixon et al. 2002, Rodenhouse et al. 1997, Seitz et al. 2001).”
Home site advantage in two long‐lived arctic plant species: results from two 30‐year reciprocal transplant studies (2012, background): “While ecotypic specialization confers a fitness 70 advantage relative to other genotypes in the local environment, maladaptation of foreign 71 genotypes could inhibit their invasion into new environments (Hereford 2009).”
PART OF A SPECIAL ISSUE ON POLLINATOR-DRIVEN SPECIATION Pollinator shifts and the evolution of spur length in the moth-pollinated orchid Platanthera bifolia (2014, background): “…that populations have adapted to local environmental conditions (Clausen et al., 1940; Kawecki and Ebert, 2004; Ågren and Schemske, 2012), and have demonstrated adaptive differentiation among populations of a large number of both plant and animal species (Leimu and Fisher, 2008; Hereford, 2009).”
What are the best seed sources for ecosystem restoration on BLM and USFS lands? (2010, background): “Local adaptation is a response to selective gradients in the environment; hence, theory suggests that the strongest cases of local adaptation will emerge from environments with steep selective gradients (Hereford 2009).”
Synthetic analyses of phenotypic selection in natural populations: lessons, limitations and future directions (2012, background): “A recent meta-analysis of reciprocal transplant experiments suggests that local adaptation of geographic populations is widespread (Hereford 2009), but the traits underlying such adaptation are typically unknown.”
Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change (2010, background): “Because local adaptation is recognized as being commonplace (Hereford 2009), the focus has been on local provenance when making decisions about which seed to source for restoration and reintroduction programmes (Callaham 1964; Keller et al. 2000; McKay et al. 2005; O’Brien et al. 2007).”
Climate change, genetic markers and species distribution modelling (2015, positive): “But there is abundant evidence that, across their geographical ranges, many species are organized into differentiated genetic lineages that may be adapted to local conditions (Linhart & Grant, 1996; Leimu & Fischer, 2008; Hereford, 2009).”
Application of genetic diversity–ecosystem function research to ecological restoration (2014, background): “First, local adaptation may be less common than is presumed (Leimu & Fischer 2008; Hereford 2009).”
Identifying targets and agents of selection: innovative methods to evaluate the processes that contribute to local adaptation (2017, background): “In spatially heterogeneous landscapes, species often consist of mosaics of populations that have adapted to local biotic and abiotic conditions (e.g. Savolainen, Pyhajarvi & Knurr 2007; Leimu & Fischer 2008; Hereford 2009).”
Mechanisms of Thermal Tolerance in Reef-Building Corals across a Fine-Grained Environmental Mosaic: Lessons from Ofu, American Samoa (2018, background): “This is known as reciprocal home site advantage, where adaptation to one environment comes at a cost of adaptation to other environments (Hereford, 2009).”