Application of genetic diversity–ecosystem function research to ecological restoration
By K. Kettenring, K. Mercer, C. Adams, J. Hines. 2014
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eaa4388507ffff9fdae9fc66ad705e1d9945fcac
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Restoring species through reintroductions: strategies for source population selection (2015, background): “748 Restoration Ecology November 2015 Second, the multiple source population approach is essentially a bet-hedging strategy (Kettenring et al. 2014), and may delay the identification of a best source population.”
- Evolution of plant materials for ecological restoration: insights from the applied and basic literature (2017, methodology): “While the ecosystem-level effects of genetic variation are quite well studied (e.g. Michalet et al. 2011; Hautier et al. 2015), this research has not yet been applied to designing foundation restoration materials that support ecosystem function (but see Kettenring et al. 2014).”
- Restoration of plant species and genetic diversity depends on landscape‐scale dispersal (2018, background): “Careful selection of populations acting as sources of propagules for reintroduction may increase the genetic diversity of restored populations and can thus significantly support the long-term survival of restored plant populations (Reynolds et al. 2013; Kettenring et al. 2014).”