The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process

By Sarah L. Jack, Alistair R. Anderson. 2002

1,367 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/994004411bd23b9663d2b9d45a9bd1bf3e17bad9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Transnational Entrepreneurship: Determinants of Firm Type and Owner Attributions of Success (2009, background): “Attitudes, intentions (Bird, 1988), technological changes (Shane, 2000), and the entrepreneur’s social context (Jack & Anderson, 2002) are among the factors that have been found to influence venture creation.”
In-migrant entrepreneurship in rural England: beyond local embeddedness (2006, background): “Entrepreneurship as a contextual process has gradually acquired a ‘spatial dimension’, i.e. the actions of entrepreneurial agents are socially embedded, which is generally taken to mean local embeddedness (Oinas 1997, Murdoch 2000, Jack and Anderson 2002).”
Entrepreneurial intention: the role of gender (2010, background): “Since entrepreneurship is an embedded phenomenon, subjective perceptions about one’s environment and about the individual’s relative position in that environment are very important ( Jack and Anderson 2002 ).”
Being in Someone Else’s Shoes: the Role of Gender in Nascent Entrepreneurship (2007, background): “New firm creation is an economic process embedded in a specific environment (Jack and Anderson, 2002).”
A Multilevel Model of Employee Innovation (2016, background): “…and the individuals, teams, and units they encompass use innovation as a means to adapt to contextual changes in an effort to improve their services, procedures, practices, and products (e.g., Aldrich, 1999; Anderson, Potočnik, & Zhou, 2014; R. A. Baron, 2007; Jack & Anderson, 2002; Shane, 2008).”
The wisdom of the crowd in funding: information heterogeneity and social networks of crowdfunders (2018, background): “the relationship between funder and venture (Granovetter 1973; Hoang and Antoncic 2003; Jack and Anderson 2002; Kwon and Arenius 2010; Uzzi 1999).”
A Real Options-Driven Theory of Business Incubation (2004, background): “It is related to institutional theory, and has been used to examine the field of entrepreneurship and the process of instantiating a new firm (Jack and Anderson, 2002; Sarason et al., 2002).”
The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behavior (2006, background): “Jack and Anderson (2002) argue that new firm creation is not merely an economic process but draws from the social context which shapes and forms entrepreneurial outcomes.”
Kinship and business: how entrepreneurial households facilitate business growth (2014, background): “For example, future research could examine the specificities related to entrepreneurial households in the rural context and how the resources connected to the (rural) place these households are embedded in are drawn upon in the creation of new business activities (Jack and Anderson, 2002).”
Behind the veil: women‐only entrepreneurship training in Pakistan (2010, methodology): “Combining structuration and embeddedness theory in a similar way, Jack and Anderson (2002, p. 467)”