Technology, demand and distribution: a cumulative growth model with an application to the Dutch productivity growth slowdown
By C. Naastepad. 2006
183 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98e0110b0cb99c796c3e2583aae7dc9d1afbf10c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Engelbert Stockhammer
- Eckhard Hein
- Özlem Onaran
- Servaas Storm
- C. Naastepad
- D. Kiefer
- C. Rada
- M. Lavoie
Citations in the corpus
- Macroeconomic Policy Mix, Employment and Inflation in a Post-Keynesian Alternative to the New Consensus Model (2010, background): “See Bhaduri (2006) on the theoretical arguments, and Hein & Tarassow (2009), Naastepad (2006) and Naastepad & Storm (2007) for empirical analysis. curve flatter by means of reducing workers’ and firms’ inflation push in the face of unexpected inflation, which means increasing firms’ and workers’…”
- Profit maximising goes global: the race to the bottom (2015, background): “Notable contributions are from Blecker (1989), Dutt (1984), Lavoie (1995), Naastepad (2006) among others.”
- Testing the Bhaduri–Marglin model with OECD panel data (2014, unknown): “Naastepad (2006) evaluates the shares at the sample mean.”
- OECD demand regimes (1960-2000) (2006, background): “The Dutch example provides a good illustration (Naastepad, 2006): in a central agreement (of 1982) between labor unions, employers’ organizations, and government, voluntary real wage restraint by workers was exchanged for a promise by firms to increase investment and, hence, employment, and for a pr”
- Conspicuous Consumption, Inequality and Debt: The Nature of Consumption‐driven Profit‐led Regimes (2015, unknown): “…While the empirical results are often ambiguous (see e.g. Bowles and Boyer, 1995; Gordon, 1995; Hein and Tarassow, 2010; Hein and Vogel, 2008; Naastepad, 2006; Naastepad and Storm, 2006-7; Stockhammer and Onaran, 2004; Stockhammer et al., 2009), the theoretical concept itself is fairly…”
- Distribution, aggregate demand and productivity growth: theory and empirical results for six OECD countries based on a post-Kaleckian model (2010, methodology): “Following Setterfield/Cornwall (2002) and also Naastepad (2006), we will distinguish between the demand regime and the productivity regime in our model.”
- Distribution and growth reconsidered: empirical results for six OECD countries (2007, background): “In the case of the Netherlands, an additional lagged variable d[log(Wt–1)] had to be included to correct for first order autocorrelation.”
- Wage-led growth: Concept, theories and policies (2012, background): “Naastepad (2006) llegó a la conclusión de que un aumento de 1% en los salarios reales conduciría a uno de 0.52% en la productividad laboral de los Países Bajos.”