OECD demand regimes (1960-2000)

By C. Naastepad, Servaas Storm. 2006

273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7473a9336885f709041c5999ca5042075b0a466

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Personal income inequality and aggregate demand (2016, background): “Studies accommodating open economy effects (Bowles and Boyer, 1995; Naastepad and Storm, 2007; Ederer and Stockhammer, 2007; Hein and Vogel, 2008) find that small open economies (like the”
Reconsidering the Investment-Profit Nexus in Finance-Led Economies: An ARDL-Based Approach (2008, result): “Comparable and more recent studies include Ederer and Stockhammer (2007), Hein and Vogel (2007) and Naastepad and Storm (2007).6 These studies come to different conclusions about the wage-led or 6 Bhaskar and Glyn (1995) also estimate an investment function inspired by the Bhaduri– Marglin model,…”
Distribution and growth reconsidered: empirical results for six OECD countries (2007, background): “Naastepad and Storm (2007) also report higher effects of a change in the profit share on consumption in the Anglo-Saxon countries.”
Globalization and the effects of changes in functional income distribution on aggregate demand in Germany (2011, background): “Naastepad and Storm (2007) estimate the log of the investment share in GDP as a function of the log of GDP and (the log of) the profit share and include a time trend.”
Interest rates, distribution and capital accumulation – A post-Kaleckian perspective on the US and Germany (2011, background): “Naastepad and Storm ( 2006-07 ) analysed investment for several OECD countries from 1960 to 2000.”
Wage-led growth in the EU15 member-states: the effects of income distribution on growth, investment, trade balance and inflation (2016, result): “While the results of single country versus panel data estimations are not comparable, it is worth noting that single equation and VAR estimation strategies have yielded contradicting results in some cases, mostly for the case of the US, and although the US is not the focus of this paper, the differe”
Financialisation, income distribution and aggregate demand in the USA (2011, background): “Naastepad and Storm (2007) for eight and Hein and Vogel (2008) for six OECD countries are more recent examples.”
Debt-driven growth? Wealth, distribution and demand in OECD countries (2016, background): “Bhaduri and Marglin (1990) presented a unifying framework, which allows for both wage-led and profit-led regimes that has become a widely used tool within post-Keynesian economics and has inspired a rich empirical literature (Bowles and Boyer 1995; Stockhammer and Onaran 2004; Naastepad and Storm 20”
Income Distribution and Growth: A Global Model (2014, methodology): “…the effects of the changes in the wage share on growth by means of estimating single equations for consumption, investment, exports, and imports for each country as is widely used in the literature (eg, Hein and Vogel, 2008; Naastepad and Storm, 2007; Onaran et al, 2011; Stockhammer et al, 2009).”
Conspicuous Consumption, Inequality and Debt: The Nature of Consumption‐driven Profit‐led Regimes (2015, unknown): “…results are often ambiguous (see e.g. Bowles and Boyer, 1995; Gordon, 1995; Hein and Tarassow, 2010; Hein and Vogel, 2008; Naastepad, 2006; Naastepad and Storm, 2006-7; Stockhammer and Onaran, 2004; Stockhammer et al., 2009), the theoretical concept itself is fairly clear-cut: a country…”
Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the Euro area (2008, methodology): “Onaran and Stockhammer (2005) employ a similar model for Turkey and Korea.”