Distribution and growth reconsidered: empirical results for six OECD countries
By Eckhard Hein, L. Vogel. 2007
331 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/737324f03491cef399a7bc48a6582592bd9bf2e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Özlem Onaran
- Engelbert Stockhammer
- Eckhard Hein
- T. Obst
- G. Galanis
- Lucas Grafl
- Till van Treeck
- Stefan Ederer
Citations in the corpus
- Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the Euro area (2008, background): “Hein and Vogel (2007) use a similar approach for Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, UK and the USA.”
- Interest rates, distribution and capital accumulation – A post-Kaleckian perspective on the US and Germany (2011, background): “Hein and Vogel ( 2008 ) study several countries for the period 1960–2005.”
- Is the Nairu Theory a Monetarist, New Keynesian, Post Keynesian or a Marxist Theory? (2008, background): “17 The empirical identification of demand regime has been the subject of several studies recently (Bowles and Boyer, 1995; Stockhammer and Onaran, 2004; Naastepad and Storm, 2006–7; Hein and Vogel, 2007; Stockhammer et al., 2007).”
- Debt-driven growth? Wealth, distribution and demand in OECD countries (2016, methodology): “Post-Keynesian (PK) macroeconomics has long recognised the importance of finance in general and asset prices and debt specifically. Minsky (1995) regarded debt cycles as the driver of economic fluctuations.”
- Testing the Bhaduri–Marglin model with OECD panel data (2014, neutral): “Hein and Vogel (2008), for instance, find a significantly positive impact of a rise in the profit share on real investment growth only for the Netherlands.”
- Income Distribution and Growth: A Global Model (2014, methodology): “(9) Our results are consistent with those of Stockhammer et al (2009; 2011), Hein and Vogel (2008), Ederer and Stockhammer (2007), and Onaran et al (2011).”
- Personal income inequality and aggregate demand (2016, background): “Personal income distribution influences saving out of wages, it thereby also affects the demand regime of the economy, a feature that has received much attention over the past 20 years (Bowles and Boyer, 1995; Taylor, 2004; BarbosaFilho and Taylor, 2006; Chiarella, Franke, Flaschel, and Semmler, 200”
- Europe’s Hunger Games: Income Distribution, Cost Competitiveness and Crisis (2015, background): “The reason is that even though there is much lofty talk about ‘building a knowledge economy’ and ‘promoting smart growth 4 Evidence on wage-led domestic demand in the EU is provided by Storm and Naastepad (2007, 2012); Hein and Vogel (2008); Stockhammer et al.”
- Financialisation, income distribution and aggregate demand in the USA (2011, background): “Naastepad and Storm (2007) for eight and Hein and Vogel (2008) for six OECD countries are more recent examples.”
- Wage-led growth in the EU15 member-states: the effects of income distribution on growth, investment, trade balance and inflation (2016, background): “We estimate the distributional effects on individual components of private aggregate demand, which are consumption, investment, exports and imports for each country as is widely applied in the literature (Stockhammer et al., 2009; Onaran and Galanis, 2014; Hein and Vogel, 2008).”
- Globalization and the effects of changes in functional income distribution on aggregate demand in Germany (2011, background): “See the results in Hein and Vogel (2008) and in Stockhammer and Ederer (2008) for Austria and the Netherlands.”
- Is aggregate demand wage-led or profit-led? National and global effects (2012, methodology): “This is consistent with the findings in Hein and Vogel (2008). However,”
- Profit maximising goes global: the race to the bottom (2015, background): “1 Nonetheless, recent indication of rising inequality has made the profession highlight more the role of income distribution in the making of the financial and economic crises this time around (Taylor (2011), Kumhof and Ranciere (2010), Rajan (2010)).”