Facial signs of emotional experience.
By Paul Ekman, W. Freisen, S. Ancoli. 1980
Subfields: Cognitive Science & Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Science & Psychology
- Barbara L. Fredrickson
- R. Levenson
- Louis-philippe Morency
- Amir Zadeh
- Percy Liang
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Yao-Hung Hubert Tsai
- Dawn A. Matsumoto
Citations in the corpus
- Multimodal Transformer for Unaligned Multimodal Language Sequences (2019, methodology): “We use Facet (iMotions, 2017) to indicate 35 facial action units, which records facial muscle movement (Ekman et al., 1980; Ekman, 1992) for representing per-frame basic and advanced emotions.”
- Multimodal Language Analysis in the Wild: CMU-MOSEI Dataset and Interpretable Dynamic Fusion Graph (2018, methodology): “We extract facial action units through Facial Action Coding System (FACS) (Ekman et al., 1980).”
- Entertainment matters! The relationship between challenge and persuasiveness of an advergame for children (2012, unknown): “Ekman 1993 ; Ekman and Friesen 1986 ; Ekman, Freisen and Ancoli 1980 ).”
- Emotional Empathy as Related to Mimicry Reactions at Different Levels of Information Processing (2003, background): “These reactions have then been interpreted as either distress smiles, grimaces, or as cross-talk from other muscles (Brown & Schwartz, 1980; Ekman, Friesen, & Ancoli, 1980; Lang, Greenwald, Bradley, & Hamm, 1993).”
- Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients (2017, unknown): “Self-reports carry information about a person’s internal state (1, 9) and correlate with other psychological processes that are thought to be emotion-related, such as expressive behavior (60–63).”
- Is eye contact the key to the social brain? (2010, background): “Early research on the smile revealed that the frequency, intensity, and duration of the zygomaticus major muscle activity positively predicted self-reported happiness of the smiler (Ekman et al. 1980; Cacioppo et al. 1986).”
- Emotions Don't Lie: An Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection Method using Affective Cues (2020, methodology): “The CMU-MOSEI dataset describes the perceived emotion space with 6 discrete emotions following the Ekman model [24]: happy, sad, angry, fearful, surprise, and disgust, and a “neutral” emotion to denote the absence of any of these emotions.”
- Coherence between Emotion and Facial Expression: Evidence from Laboratory Experiments (2013, background): “…correlations between self-ratings of experienced disgust evoked by diverse disgusting stimuli and facial expressions reported in several studies were low to moderate (e.g., .37–.55, Ekman et al., 1980) and sometimes nonsignificant (e.g., r < .20, Jäncke & Kaufmann, 1994, Experiment 1).”
- Carrying too Heavy a Load? The Communication and Miscommunication of Emotion by Email (2008, background): “Because emotions tend to be expressed and perceived nonverbally rather than verbally (Ekman et al., 1980), the relative dearth of cues in email, compared with 2008 311 Byron”
- On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection (2018, background): “To detect deception, researchers have examined the role of behavioral, emotional, and linguistic cues [17, 19, 39, 42, 54, 75].”
- Do Iconic Hand Gestures Really Contribute to the Communication of Semantic Information in a Face-to-Face Context? (2009, background): “A considerable amount of research has focussed on facial communication, particularly with respect to the communication of emotion (e.g., Darwin 1872; Ekman 1993, 1999; Ekman et al. 1980 ).”