Anterior cingulate cortex, selection for action, and error processing

By Clay B. Holroyd, Sander Nieuwenhuis, Rogier B. Mars, Michael G. H. Coles. 2004

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98a914b3b68d05744ae0fe5e4e0873daf729a19f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Performance Monitoring in the Anterior Cingulate is Not All Error Related: Expectancy Deviation and the Representation of Action-Outcome Associations (2007, methodology): “According to this view, an evaluative signal from the mesencephalic dopamine system activates the ACC ( Holroyd, Nieuwenhuis, Mars, & Coles, 2004; Holroyd & Coles, 2002).”
The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. (2006, background): “…the one hand, according to a monotonically increasing function, such that outcomes with intermediate values produces FRNs of intermediate amplitude (Holroyd et al., 2004a), or on the other hand, according to a binary function, such that FRNs of intermediate amplitude are not possible (cf. Yeung…”
Dissociable components of error processing: On the functional significance of the Pe vis-à-vis the ERN/Ne (2005, background): “The Ne is typically followed by the Pe, a slow positive wave with a diffuse scalp distribution and maximum amplitude between 200–400 ms. Whereas the sensitivity of the Ne to various experimental factors and individual differences has been scrutinized extensively ( Holroyd, Nieuwenhuis, Mars, & Coles”
Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: the role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. (2004, background): “No consensus exists as to such a dissociation in humans (Hester, Fassbender, & Garavan, 2004; Holroyd et al., 2004; Ullsperger & von Cramon, 2004).”