Corporate Governance in Germany: The Role of Banks and Ownership Concentration
By J. Edwards, M. Nibler. 2000
164 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9831ba76ae2d8239e65ab594086da7cef5ffc5e6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Economics and Econometrics
- Mary O’Sullivan
- Michael Firth
- Yizhe Dong
- Wenxuan Hou
- Chao Meng
- William Lazonick
- Till van Treeck
- Gregory Jackson
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Product market competition, corporate governance and firm performance: An empirical analysis for Germany (2002, background): “However, recent evidence suggests that proxy voting is extremely unlikely to significantly enhance bank voting power (Edwards and Nibler, 2000).”
- The political economy of comparative corporate governance (2003, background): “Moreover, the level of employee shareholding in these companies was relatively low; on average, employees held 3.7 percent of the capital of these companies which is considerably lower than in the US and Britain (L’Observatoire de l’Actionnariat Salarié en Europe, 2001; Balligand and Foucauld, 2000:”
- The Determinants of Capital Structure: Capital Market-Oriented versus Bank-Oriented Institutions (2008, unknown): “Agency costs and indirect bankruptcy costs are also known to be higher in Anglo-Saxon countries due to the arm's length relation between creditors and borrowers (Edwards and Nibler (2000)).”
- Bankers on the Boards of German Firms: What They Do, What They are Worth, and Why They are (Still) There (2010, unknown): “Edwards and Nibler (2000) investigate a cross-section of 156 of the largest non-financial German firms and find a positive impact of the equity ownership of the top three banks, but they undertake neither causality analysis nor control for unobserved heterogeneity and several other effects we…”
- Ownership Structure and Risk-Taking: Comparative Evidence from Private and State-Controlled Banks in China (2014, background): “According to Shleifer and Vishny (1986) and Edwards and Nibler (2000), concentrated ownership enhances corporate control by improving the monitoring of management.”
- Does Good Corporate Governance Include Employee Representation? Evidence from German Corporate Boards (2006, unknown): “In contrast to Cable (1985), but consistent with Edwards and Nibler (2000), we find little evidence in favor of a value-creating role for bank representation on the supervisory board.”
- Insider ownership and corporate performance: evidence from Germany (2008, unknown): “The results of Edwards and Weichenrieder are in line with prior findings of Edwards and Nibler (2000) which concluded that ownership concentration is a more important factor in the German corporate governance system than banks, which originally were thought to posses a dominating role.”