Randomised Controlled Trials for Evidence-based Education: Some Problems in Judging 'What Works'

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Research engagement in English language teaching (2007, background): “Within the framework of EBP outlined above, one strand of inquiry has focused on examining what teachers actually think about research (Everton, Galton, & Pell, 2000, 2002; McNamara, 2002; .”
Implementation Research (2016, background): “In medical clinical settings, “what works” is a matter of judgment that weighs, judges, and considers RCT findings in context (Morrison, 2001).”
Grammar for writing? An investigation of the effects of contextualised grammar teaching on students’ writing (2012, unknown): “(Morrison 2001).”
A systematic review of social marketing effectiveness (2007, background): “…cities or communities are used; it is also difficult, where effects are found, to identify whether these are attributable to particular intervention components, or to the combination of activities, or to other factors such as secular trends (Wolff, 2000; Fawcett et al, 1997; Morrison, 2001).”
Language teacher research engagement (2010, background): “For further perspectives on this debate, see Hammersley (2001, 2004b), Davies (2000), Maxwell (2004), Morrison (2001) and Feuer, Towne & Shavelson (2002).”