Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences

By Bruno D. Zumbo, Eric K. H. Chan. 2014

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97d99d126db59c0c69ffe8291d6a21916dff1347

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. L. Mokkink
2. Lex M. Bouter
3. HC de Vet
4. C. Terwee
5. Jordi Alonso
6. C. Prinsen
7. D.walaa badawy
8. A. Chiarotto

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. L. Mokkink
2. C. Terwee
3. Lex M. Bouter
4. HC de Vet
5. Jordi Alonso
6. C. Prinsen
7. D.walaa badawy
8. A. Chiarotto

Citations in the corpus

• COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study (2018, methodology): “The new COSMIN standards and criteria for content validity are not substantially different from earlier published guidelines, including the original COSMIN standards for content validity, but they are more detailed, standardized, and transparent [3, 20, 21, 23, 24, 37].”