Democratizing Innovation

By Daniel M. Shapiro, Jim Euchner. 2016

329 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/975ce8df086fb69b0450afacd756305e55459ed2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

To recover faster from Covid-19, open up: Managerial implications from an open innovation perspective (2020, unknown): “User innovation may have a role to play here as well (Von Hippel, 2005; Von Hippel, 2016) —because we know that solutions to complex problems may come for non-conventional sources, particularly when 4…”
Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation (2014, background): “(von Hippel, 2005, p.2) His specific perspective on open innovation has more recently been described as follows: “An innovation is “open” in our terminology when allinformation related to the innovation is a public good—nonrivalrous and nonexcludable.”
A Network-based view of regional growth (2014, background): “Von Hippel (2005) highlights how markets and user-led innovation in a number of industries, such as design, are becoming increasingly international in scope.”
Some simple economics of the blockchain (2016, background): “As in open source projects (Von Hippel 2002, Von Hippel and Von Krogh 2003, Von Hippel 2005), early adopters may be willing to dedicate time and eﬀort to support a new platform because they want to create a viable alternative to established products and derive utility from developing the technology…”
Doing More with Less: Innovation Input and Output in Family Firms (2016, background): “…by Schumpeter (1934), but also by the firm ’ s network (Chesbrough, 2003; Dahlander & Gann, 2010), particularly its interactions with consumers (Von Hippel, 2005), and by the degree to which the firm is able to internalize and harvest external knowledge (absorptive capacity; Cohen & Levinthal,…”
Inclusive innovation: an architecture for policy development (2014, background): “The innovation literature in high-income countries has paid increasing attention to the role played by consumers in not just shaping but participating in innovation processes (notably the work of von Hippel 2005).”
Responsible Innovation and the Innovation of Responsibility: Governing Sustainable Development in a Globalized World (2015, unknown): “(von Hippel 2005, p. 50) Both organizational and governmental mechanisms try to ensure that businesses can be held liable for the potential negative consequences of their operation by introducing sanctions and controls.”
On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship (2018, background): “…involving established and new firms, as well as a wide range of organizations, including universities, federal labs, and different types of innovation intermediaries (Chesbrough & Bogers, 2014; Nambisan & Sawhney, 2007; Perkmann & West, 2015; Schillo & Kinder, 2017; Von Hippel, 2005).”
Managing technological change in the digital age: the role of architectural frames (2014, background): “Such a move affords the opportunity to specializing and instantiating new applications or services for particular groups of users (cf. von Hippel, 2005).”
Introduction - Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age (2018, background): “This digitization, coupled with the powerful democratization of innovation (Chesbrough 2006, Von Hippel 2005, Zittrain 2006), has had a disruptive e ﬀ ect of redistributing control across online participants and the applications they use to interact and co-create value.”