Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires – a review

By J. Cade, Rachel L. Thompson, V. Burley, D. Warm. Public Health Nutrition, 2002

1,357 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Both Comprehensive and Brief Self-Administered Diet History Questionnaires Satisfactorily Rank Nutrient Intakes in Japanese Adults (2012, methodology): “3,4,8–11 The DHQ consists of 7 sections: (1) general dietary behavior, (2) usual cooking methods, (3) consumption frequency and amount of alcoholic beverages, (4) consumption frequency and semiquantitative portion size of selected food and nonalcoholic beverage items, (5) dietary supplements, (6) co”
Comparison of relative validity of food group intakes estimated by comprehensive and brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaires against 16 d dietary records in Japanese adults (2011, neutral): “Long-term dietary habits are often assessed using dietary questionnaires((1)); however, given that food culture and dietary habits vary by country, these need to be developed specifically for each country((2)).”
A New Deep Learning-Based Food Recognition System for Dietary Assessment on An Edge Computing Service Infrastructure (2018, methodology): “Unfortunately, most of the current methods for dietary assessment (for example, 24 hour dietary recall [3] and food frequency questionnaires [4]) must rely onmemory to recall foods eaten.”
Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire in an elderly Mediterranean population of Spain (2010, positive): “Therefore, a dietary assessment method is frequently chosen as a reference when validating an FFQ((24)), even for specific nutrients((14)).”