Cultural and linguistic factors in audiovisual speech processing: The McGurk effect in Chinese subjects

By K. Sekiyama. 1997

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. K. Yokosawa
2. Debra M. Hardison
3. Shoko Kanaya
4. Yi-Chuan Chen
5. Kazuya Saito

Citations in the corpus

• Privacy-Preserving Adversarial Representation Learning in ASR: Reality or Illusion? (2019, neutral): “Indeed, state-of-the-art speech processing algorithms can infer not only the spoken contents from the speech signal, but also the speaker’s identity [5], intention [6–9], gender [10, 11], emotional state [12–14], pathological condition [15–17], personality [18, 19] and cultural [20, 21] attributes t”
• Multisensory integration of speech signals: the relationship between space and time (2006, unknown): “The McGurk eVect has been widely investigated (Green et al. 1991; Walker et al. 1995; Rosenblum et al. 1997; Sekiyama 1997; Hampson et al. 2003; Windmann 2004) and has served as a valuable tool for examining the integration of audiovisual speech signals.”
• The Role of Audiovisual Speech and Orthographic Information in Nonnative Speech Production (2005, unknown): “In turn, Sekiyama (1997a) found that Mandarin speakers were less prone to the McGurk effect than their Japanese counterparts.”
• Acquisition of second-language speech: Effects of visual cues, context, and talker variability (2003, methodology): “…in Japan with an A-only intelligibility of 67% for AE /R/ showed no improvement when the visual cue was added (Sekiyama & Tohkura, 1993); however, Sekiyama (1997) later found a positive correlation between the magnitude of the McGurk effect and the length of stay in the L2 environment for…”
• Perceptual congruency of audio-visual speech affects ventriloquism with bilateral visual stimuli (2011, background): “This is thought to be due to either the sound structure of Japanese or their nature of less reliance on visual information in speech perception ( Sekiyama, 1997 ).”