Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking.

By Klaus R. Scherer. 2001

1,787 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96d04974f796ee1b80d4988ff5cd3b25efeaab4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. (2009, background): “…2007b), self-consciousness emotions involve appraising events as congruent or incongruent with one's goals, values, and self-image; as caused by oneself instead of other people; and as consistent or inconsistent with personal and cultural standards (Lazarus, 1991; Roseman, 2001; Scherer, 2001).”
Cognitive Appraisals and Interest in Visual Art: Exploring an Appraisal Theory of Aesthetic Emotions (2005, background): “The appraisal structure of anger, for example, involves (1) appraising an event as relevant to a goal; (2) appraising the event as incongruent with the goal; (3) judging a threat to one’s social- or self-esteem; and (4) blaming someone for the threat (Scherer, 2001).”
The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model (2009, methodology): “…example shows, if one knows the results of an individual’s event appraisal on the major checks, one can approximately predict (see Table 5.4 in Scherer, 2001) what kind of emotion he or she will most likely experience (or more precisely, what label the person is likely to use to refer to the…”
Facial expressions allow inference of both emotions and their components (2008, methodology): “…mode were constructed on the basis of current assumptions about the appraisal profiles underlying the seven emotions (see Roseman & Smith, 2001; Scherer, 2001).3 The action tendency formulations were constructed on the basis of 1 We could not use exactly the same photos as in the Yik and…”
Appreciation as Audience Response: Exploring Entertainment Gratifications beyond Hedonism. (2010, background): “A possible explanation of how emotional involvement might foster this rewarding state of intrinsic motivation can be derived from cognitive theories of emotion (e.g., Lazarus, 1991; Scherer, 2001).”
Feelings and Consumer Decision Making: Extending the Appraisal-Tendency Framework (2007, background): “Emotion-specific core appraisal themes, in turn, influence the likelihood of specific courses of action (Lazarus, 1991; Frijda, 1986; Roseman, Wiest, & Swartz, 1994; Scherer, 1999, 2001).”
TARGET ARTICLE: "Putting the Self Into Self-Conscious Emotions: A Theoretical Model" (2004, unknown): “Appraisal theories were developed specifically to describe the cognitive appraisals that distinguish among emotions (e.g., Lazarus, 1991; Roseman, 1991; Scherer, 2001; Smith & Ellsworth, 1985).”
Culture‐specific appraisal biases contribute to emotion dispositions (2009, background): “Thus, Scherer (1987) suggested that affect disturbances can be explained by the CPM in terms of ‘abnormal’ results of the various stimulus evaluation checks.”
Toward a theoretical model to understand teacher emotions and teacher burnout in the context of student misbehavior: Appraisal, regulation and coping (2013, background): “Cognitive appraisal theories of emotions suggest that emotions are elicited by evaluations (appraisals) of events and situations, and discrete emotions can be differentiated based upon individuals’ appraisals of situations and events (Arnold 1960; Lazarus 1991; Roseman and Smith 2001; Scherer 2001).”
Expression, Perception, and Induction of Musical Emotions: A Review and a Questionnaire Study of Everyday Listening (2004, background): “Researchers disagree as to whether emotions are best conceptualized as categories (Ekman, 1992), dimensions (Russell, 1980), prototypes (Shaver et al., 1987), or component processes (Scherer, 2001).”
Effects of Goal Framing and Emotions on Perceived Threat and Willingness to Sacrifice for Climate Change (2017, background): “Against the backdrop of the appraisal theory of emotions (for an overview, see Ellsworth & Scherer, 2003; Scherer, 2001), it makes sense to assume that goal frames evoke discrete emotions since they foreground different degrees of situational pleasantness, control of outcomes, and outcome certainty ”