Self-congruity and destination choice

By Asunción Beerli, G. Meneses, S. M. Gil. 2007

313 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96c2db063d8a83f0ecb8cd6d22ed37a5863a33c2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Self-Congruity Theory: To What Extent Does It Hold in Tourism? (2011, methodology): “In one case (Litvin and Goh 2002), congruity was calculated by simply comparing the individual score and the destination score, and in the other (Beerli, Meneses, and Gil 2007), congruity was determined by calculating the squared difference between the respondents’ self-assessments and their…”
Effects of brand personality, self-congruity and functional congruity on hotel brand loyalty (2019, background): “Within this context, researches performed toward tourism destinations have revealed that actual and ideal SC positively influence tourist satisfaction (Chon & Olsen, 1991), destination choice (Beerli et al., 2007), intention to recommend and revisit the destination in the future (Pan et al.”
Self-image congruence in consumer behavior (2012, methodology): “Following the tourism literature (e.g., Beerli et al., 2007), the study here uses the term self-image congruence to denote thematchbetween tourists' (cruisers') self-concept (actual and ideal) and the image of other tourists (cruisers).”
Appraisal Determinants of Tourist Emotional Responses (2012, background): “Similarly, tourism literatures recognize the relevance of self-image congruence in understanding tourist behaviors (e.g., Sirgy and Su 2000; Litvin, Goh, and Goldsmith 2001; Litvin and Goh 2002; Beerli, Meneses, and Gil 2007).”
Self-congruity theory in consumer behavior: A little history (2018, background): “…self-congruity (and the underlying self-consistency motive) shows that this construct is a strong predictor of brand choice (e.g. Ascher, 1985; Beerli et al., 2007; Ericksen & Sirgy, 1992; Hsieh & O’Leary, 1994; Hung & Petrick, 2011; Jackson, 1973; Klenosky, Charles, & Michael, 1993; Krishen…”
Destination Image: A Meta-Analysis of 2000–2007 Research (2010, background): “Beerli et al. (2007) also note the connection between personality and emotions and posit a chain of questions to researchers, one of them being “How does emotional involvement influence congruity?””
Understanding Potential and Repeat Visitors’ Travel Intentions: The Roles of Travel Motivations, Destination Image, and Visitor Image Congruity (2021, result): “In contrast with our predictions and previous studies (e.g., Beerli, Meneses, and Gil 2007), we found that visitor image congruity had a stronger effect on travel intentions for repeat visitors.”
Predicting Wine Tourism Intention: Destination Image and Self-congruity (2014, background): “The effect of involvement has been found to moderate the effect of congruity where the greater the involvement with travelling, the more important is congruity (Beerli et al., 2007).”
Self-congruence, functional congruence, and destination choice (2013, background): “For example, destination selfcongruence affects intention to visit, intention to recommend, positive attitudes towards a destination, higher tourist satisfaction, and tourist loyalty (Beerli et al., 2007; Chon, 1992; Chon and Olsen, 1991; Kastenholz, 2004; Litvin and Goh, 2002; Sirgy and Su, 2000).”