Current Methods for Calculating National Ecological Footprint Accounts 【特集論文エコロジカル・フットプリント指標の現状と課題】

By Justin Kitzes, Audrey Peller, Steve Goldfinger, Mathis Wackernagel. 2007

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Managing Without Growth: Slower by Design, Not Disaster (2008, background): “However, measurement of the ecological footprint is based on ‘prevailing technology and resource management’ (Kitzes et al. 2007).”
Managing without growth (2008, background): “However, measurement of the ecological footprint is based on ‘prevailing technology and resource management’ (Kitzes et al. 2007).”
A multicriteria approach for measuring the sustainability of different poultry production systems (2012, background): “, hectares with global average productivity (Kitzes et al., 2007; Galli et al., 2007).”
The Use of Reference Values in Indicator-Based Methods for the Environmental Assessment of Agricultural Systems (2011, methodology): “This method has been updated several times and applied largely at national levels [20-25].”
The Disaster Risk, Global Change, and Sustainability Nexus (2019, background): “Nevertheless, calls for reducing the human footprint on the environment [29] were largely ignored.”
Answers to common questions in Ecological Footprint accounting (2009, background): “Ecological Footprint book, subsequent extensions (Monfreda et al., 2004; Kitzes et al., 2007), and current Ecological Footprint Standards (Global Footprint Network, 2006).”