Answers to common questions in Ecological Footprint accounting

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: Overview of a footprint family (2014, background): “A strength of the ecological footprint lies in its spatial depend- ence for easy interpretation as it translates the demand for biological resources and energy by the population into an easily interpretable area-based unit (Cranston and Hammond, 2012; Kitzes and Wackernagel, 2009).”
Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study (2010, background): “Some efforts have been made in this direction [58,19], but they are still not sufficient.”
A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods (2010, methodology): “For commodities, although there is some merit in identifying the different bioproductivity demands of biofuels with the EF [4], more sophisticated methods of ecological research will have to be used to come to comprehensive conclusions (compare to [35]).”