Decision By Objectives: How To Convince Others That You Are Right
By E. Forman, Mary Ann Selly. 2001
354 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9642d8a376016edc8468a8fabb2b1676f13d0562
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- W. S. V. Roekel
- Lori Tavasszy
- Jafar Rezaei
- Bakhtiar Feizizadeh
- Thomas Blaschke
- Dragan Pamucar
- Seyed Jafar Sadjadi
- Mahdi Karimi
Citations in the corpus
- GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran (2012, methodology): “One of the strengths of the AHP method is that it allows for inconsistent relationships while at the same time, providing a CR as an indicator of the degree of consistency or inconsistency (Forman and Selly 2001; Chen et al. 2009).”
- Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method (2015, background): “Unfortunately, however, for several reasons (for instance lack of concentration) there are recurring inconsistencies in pairwise comparison matrices [33].”
- Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method (2018, background): “The second problem is the inconsistency between the comparisons, which can be caused by several reasons, such as a lack of concentration or information (Forman and Selly, 2001).”