Climate and the match or mismatch between predator requirements and resource availability
By J. M. Durant, D. Hjermann, Geir Ottersen, Nils Chr. Stenseth. 2007
909 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95b1278919edbf151be26fee985c70457966a617
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- R. Crawford
- P. Trathan
- P. Dalpadado
- S. Jennings
- J. Forcada
- J. Blanchard
- Henri Weimerskirch
- David Mouillot
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- David Mouillot
- G. Woodward
- Wilfried Thuiller
- Erik Jeppesen
- J. Tylianakis
- M. Daufresne
- Camille Albouy
- David A. Wardle
Citations in the corpus
- Penguin responses to climate change in the Southern Ocean (2009, background): “…shifts in penguin phenology in relation to prey phenology are important; the concept of synchrony is equivalent to the hypothesis of ‘match-mismatch’ (Cushing, 1990; Durant et al., 2007), whereby the environment regulates the balance between predator requirements and availability of prey resources.”
- Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. (2008, background): “Slight differences in the physiological responses of plants, herbivores and predators to temperature cues may positively or negatively affect their synchrony, with important consequences for herbivore population sizes (van Asch & Visser 2007) and predator population growth (Durant et al. 2007).”
- The effects of phenological mismatches on demography (2010, background): “A species will probably be more sensitive to mismatches, and mismatches will more probably occur, if the resource it interacts with has a narrow, bellshaped temporal distribution (Durant et al. 2007).”
- Spatial ecology and conservation of seabirds facing global climate change: a review (2009, neutral): “The impact of climate on match–mismatch events has been thoroughly reviewed by Durant et al. (2007, see also Suryan et al. 2006, Cury et al. 2008).”
- Ecological Networks in a Changing Climate (2010, background): “In modern ecological parlance, Elton was ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS IN A CHANGING CLIMATE 111 highlighting the important role of phenology in controlling the links that are realized in ecological networks (cf. Durant et al., 2007).”
- Observed and predicted effects of climate change on Arctic caribou and reindeer (2018, background): “This divergence from phenological 127 synchrony is often referred to as a trophic mismatch, phenological mismatch, or a match-128 mismatch (Stenseth and Mysterud 2002; Parmesan 2006; Durant et al. 2007; Doiron et al. 129 2015).”
- The Mediterranean Sea as a ‘cul‐de‐sac’ for endemic fishes facing climate change (2010, background): “It was more likely that climate change and subsequent range shifts would induce a spatial mismatch between carnivorous fish species and their prey (Durant et al., 2007); however, this is not possible to predict, because geographic distributions of small prey and trophic links are only partially know”
- Climate warming and ectotherm body size – from individual physiology to community ecology (2013, neutral): “2005) and changes in phenology (Stenseth et al. 2002; Walther et al. 2002; Durant et al. 2007).”