Legal Irritants: How Unifying Law Ends up in New Divergences

By G. Teubner. 2001

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9570c6b223dd97584d9d2c3476c6ce6cd79299bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Selin Dilli
2. Beth Ahlering
3. J. Armour
4. Simon Deakin
5. G. Morgan
6. Ajit Singh
7. A. Herrmann
8. M. Siems

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Selin Dilli
2. Beth Ahlering
3. Simon Deakin
4. G. Morgan
5. Ajit Singh
6. A. Herrmann
7. M. Siems
8. Niklas Elert

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Selin Dilli
2. Beth Ahlering
3. J. Armour
4. Simon Deakin
5. G. Morgan
6. Ajit Singh
7. A. Herrmann
8. M. Siems

Citations in the corpus

• Institutional Legacies and Firm Dynamics: The Growth and Internationalization of UK and German Law Firms (2005, background): “The composition of the law firms thus mirrors to some extent the complexity and diversity in the development of European law (Teubner 2001).”
• The Evolution of Labour Law: Calibrating and Comparing Regulatory Regimes (2007, background): “…process, as well at the more intangible level of regulatory culture and ‘legal style’ (Markesinis, 1994), there are important differences between common law and civil law approaches, these could potentially constitute barriers to the flow of ideas from one system to another (see Teubner, 2001).”
• Varieties of entrepreneurship: exploring the institutional foundations of different entrepreneurship types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ arguments (2018, background): “…governing inter-firm collaborations influence the extent to which companies can protect themselves against the theft of intellectual property (IP), depending on the extent to which institutions facilitate the enforcement of R&D contracts between collaboration partners (Tate 2001; Teubner 2001).”
• Shareholder Protection and Stock Market Development: An Empirical Test of the Legal Origins Hypothesis (2009, background): “Moreover, both the inherited legal origin effect and the effects of more recent legal borrowings and transplantations will be mediated by local forces which will tend to ‘endogenise’ law, adjusting external legal influences to local economic and political contexts, often with unexpected results: leg”
• Labor Regulation, Corporate Governance, and Legal Origin: A Case of Institutional Complementarity? (2007, background): “Many of the doctrines which are thought to be most characteristic of a distinctive civilian approach to 41 economic regulation, such as the application of the concept of good faith to commercial contracts, were judicial innovations (see Teubner, 2001; Pistor, 2005).”