Global Foreign Direct Investment Flows: The Role of Governance Infrastructure
By S. Globerman, Daniel M. Shapiro. 2002
1,046 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Development, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/953d1a0d579ecaff0ac4132298f04e36ed670e1f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
- N. Bailey
- Arne Wiig
- Ivar Kolstad
- Fuming Jiang
- Yuanfei Kang
- Kalle Pajunen
- Espen Villanger
- G. Biglaiser
In Strategy and Management
- John C. Anyanwu
- Eric Neumayer
- N. Bailey
- C. Kirkpatrick
- David W. Parker
- Yin-Fang Zhang
- Arne Wiig
- Ivar Kolstad
Citations in the corpus
- Foreign Direct Investment and Bilateral Investment Treaties an International Political Perspective (2009, background): “Finally, the sign of host country wealth is ambiguous since a high GDP per capita is simultaneously correlated with high purchasing power and high nominal wages, each exerting an opposite e ect on FDI, positive and negative respectively (Globerman and Shapiro, 2002, 2003).”
- The impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment inflows: evidence for developed and developing countries (2018, background): “The dominant view is that countries with good governance can attract more F.D.I. (Gani, 2007; Globerman & Shapiro, 2002; Globerman, Shapiro, & Tang, 2004; La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer, & Vishny, 1998; The World Bank Group, 2002), whereas an environment of weak governance cannot protect the…”
- Does good governance matter for FDI inflows? Evidence from Asian economies (2011, background): “Globerman and Shapiro (2002) argue that the governance infrastructure of a country indicates the quality of its investment environment, and thus creates favourable conditions for attracting FDI as well as economic growth.”
- Determinants of foreign direct investment in services (2008, background): “Globerman and Shapiro (2002) find a positive association between aggregate FDI and a governance index derived from Kaufmann et al (1999a,b), Harms (2002) and Biswas (2002) find positive relationships between FDI and composites of 5 See Howell (2001) for details.”
- Finding the “Democratic Advantage” in Sovereign Bond Ratings: The Importance of Strong Courts, Property Rights Protection, and the Rule of Law (2012, background): “…studies that stress the benefits of quality courts, rule of law, and stable property rights for attracting capital, see Biglaiser and Staats 2010; Brunetti, Kisunko, and Weder 1997; Feng 2001; Globerman and Shapiro 2002; Jensen 2003 and 2006; Levine 1998; Li 2006 and 2009; Li and Resnick…”
- Do Institutions Matter for Foreign Direct Investment? (2010, background): “Globerman & Shapiro 2002 144 countries 1995-97 Governance Index, Rule of law, Political instability Regulatory quality, Gove.t effectiveness, Graft and corruption, Voice and accountability; Kaufmann et al 1999 The general Governance Index is more important than its subcomponent and than Human…”
- Ownership concentration and corporate performance from a dynamic perspective: Does national governance quality matter? (2015, background): “Consistent with Globerman and Shapiro (2002), we find that these indicators are highly correlated with each other as evidenced by their significantly high correlation coefficients (unreported).”
- What determines Chinese outward FDI (2012, background): “Testing this hypothesis also allows us to address the contrary claim of Globerman and Shapiro (2009) that securing resources is a relatively unimportant motive for Chinese FDI.”
- Institutions and inflows of foreign direct investment: a fuzzy-set analysis (2008, background): “More recently, Globerman and Shapiro (2002) found some evidence that political stability may be conducive to FDI.”