Conceptualising and measuring the housing affordability problem

By M. Gabriel, K. Jacobs, Kathy Arthurson, T. Burke, J. Yates. 2005

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95259fc3dbfe4c576a2b0d5c0582d6c2d9d9df1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. B. Kearins
2. H. Pieters
3. Andrew Beer

Citations in the corpus

• An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method (2013, unknown): “This research advocates the continued use of the expenditure to income ratio due to its long tradition; ease of use and to provide continuity [18].”
• Housing Affordability and Planning in Australia: The Challenge of Policy Under Neo-liberalism (2007, background): “Estimates suggest between 700 000 and 1.1 million households are confronted by this phenomenon (AHNRC, 2001; Chapman, 2006; Gabriel et al., 2006).”
• Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability (2016, unknown): “physical quality, location and access to services and appropriateness may need to be addressed by additional complementary indicators [12].”