Theoretical reflections on agile development methodologies

By Sridhar P. Nerur, Venugopal Balijepally. Communications of the ACM, 2007

365 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94cdac96a7974ca39fb6fb1cc7c2a8e569c5875e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Torgeir Dingsøyr
2. Finn Olav Bjørnson
3. Nils Brede Moe
4. Tore Dybå

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Torgeir Dingsøyr
2. Finn Olav Bjørnson
3. Tore Dybå

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Torgeir Dingsøyr
2. Finn Olav Bjørnson
3. Tore Dybå
4. Gwanhoo Lee
5. Weidong Xia

Citations in the corpus

• Self-Organizing Roles on Agile Software Development Teams (2013, background): “Nerur et al. threw light on various issues related to transitioning into an Agile environment, broadly dividing them into technological, people-related, and process-related issues [34].”
• Knowledge management in software engineering: A systematic review of studied concepts, findings and research methods used (2008, methodology): “A main difference between methods here is if they are plan-based or traditional, which rely primarily on managing explicit knowledge, or agile methods, which primarily rely on managing tacit knowledge [86].”
• Toward Agile: An Integrated Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Field Data (2010, background): “…the agile literature suggests that a software team’s internal variety should match the variety and complexity of the environment and that the diversity of skills amplify the internal variety that enables the team to respond to the changing environment (Highsmith 2004; Nerur and Balijepally 2007).”
• A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project (2010, background): “The goal of optimization is being replaced by those of flexibility and responsiveness [33].”
• Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review (2008, background): “Nerur and Balijepally [46] compare agile development to maturing design ideas in architectural design and strategic management: “the new design metaphor incorporates learning and acknowledges the connectedness of knowing and doing (thought and action), the interwoven nature of means and ends, and th”