Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity

399 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and Assessing a Hierarchical Model With 15 Facets to Enhance Bandwidth, Fidelity, and Predictive Power (2017, methodology): “…highlighted overlaps between the facets conceptually defined by Costa and McCrae (1995), the lexical subcomponents empirically identified by Sauc-ier and Ostendorf (1999), and the AB5C facets best represented on the classic California Psychological Inventory (Gough, 1957; see Soto & John, 2009b).”
Growing to Trust (2015, background): “Whether one views trust as a subfacet of agreeableness (Soto & John, 2009) or as a distinct construct (Evans & Revelle, 2008), we believe there is value in examining agerelated changes in trust across cultures and longitudinal links with well-being, given trust’s central role in psychological…”
The Big Five Personality Traits in the Political Arena (2011, methodology): “Soto & John (2009) developed a way to assess two facets of each domain using 35 of the 44 items from the BFI [we standardize each of the personality measures (mean = 0, SD = 1)].”