Sharing the Corporate Crown Jewels

By D. Kline. 2003

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94c325f1a7a75833d69cf80bcf4278c59175bbc5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Advancing Firm Growth Research: A Focus on Growth Mode Instead of Growth Rate (2010, background): “Recent studies concerning licensing have shown that large, innovative firms such as IBM generate substantial sales growth thanks to the licensing of their technologies (Kline, 2003) and that worldwide revenues from licensing reach approximately $100 billion (The Economist, 2005).”
Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions (2008, background): “Accordingly, the view of commercializing “corporate crown jewels” by externally leveraging technology is not supported by the data [29].”
Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives (2011, background): “Possible explanations for external under exploitation include historical reasons, the possibility to use existing relationships, and the fear of diffusing relevant knowledge (Rivette and Kline, 2000) and to give away corporate ‘crown jewels’ (Kline, 2003).”
Technology exploitation in the context of open innovation: Finding the right ‘job’ for your technology (2010, background): “These negative attitudes may be explained by the underlying fear of transferring ‘corporate crown jewels’ (Kline, 2003).”
The Drivers of Technology Licensing: An Industry Comparison (2007, background): “Accordingly, firms may lose at least part of their competitive advantage by licensing out technology.(3) These negative consequences lead to the licensing dilemma, in which firms face positive effects from licensing revenues and potential negative effects from dissipating profits in their product bu”